Deriving Vector and position vectors from Force vector

AI Thread Summary
An object at rest at the origin experiences a force vector \vec{F}(t) with components dependent on constants and time. The force is used to derive the acceleration vector \vec{a}(t) by dividing by mass m. The velocity vector \vec{v}(t) is calculated by integrating the acceleration, but the integration must include constants of integration that were initially overlooked. Additionally, the term k2y in the force equation complicates the integration since y is not constant. Correctly addressing these aspects is crucial for accurately determining the position vector \vec{r}(t) and velocity vector \vec{v}(t).
HclGuy
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object of mass m is at rest at equilibirum at the origin. At t=0, a new force \vec{F}(t) is applied that has components
F_{x}(t) = k1+k2y F_{y}(t)=k3t
where k1, k2, and k3 are constants. Calculate the position r(t) and velocity v(t) vectors as functions of time.

Homework Equations


We know that Force = ma.
and that :
\int \vec{a}dt = \vec{v}(t)
\int \vec{v}dt = \vec{r}(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure if I'm doing this right but
I did
\vec{F}(t) =(k1+k2y)\hat{i}+(k3t)\hat{j}
I divided the Force vector by the scalar value of m, the mass to get \vec{a}
\vec{a}(t) = (k1+k2y)/m\hat{i}+(k3t)/m\hat{j}

\vec{v}(t)=\int \vec{a}dt = (k1+k2y)t/m \hat{i} + (k3t^2)/2m \hat{j}

then integrate the velocity vector to get the position vector, am I doing this right at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You reasoning seems good, but you are forgetting some constants when you integrate.
 
Thanks, just noticed that myself as well.
 
note that in Fx(t) = k1 + k2y, the y is not a constant, so the integral of k2y dt is not equal to k2yt
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top