Deriving x(t) into A sin (\omega*t + \varphi)

  • Thread starter Thread starter krnhseya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deriving Sin
krnhseya
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive...

x(t)=(exp^(-\zeta\omegat))*(a1(exp^(i\omegasqrt(1-\zeta^2)*t)))+a2(exp^(-i\omegasqrt(1-\zeta^2)*t))))

into

x(t)=(exp^(-\zeta\omegat))*(A sin (\omega*t + \varphi))

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



I've managed to get x(t) = (exp^(-\zeta\omegat))*((a1(cos\omega*t) + i sin (\omega*t))+(a2(cos\omega*t) - i sin (\omega*t))) then when i simplify things...sin terms cancel out and i end up geting...

exponential term * (a1+a2) * (2cos \omega*t)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Is the \zeta a constant here?

krnhseya said:
I've managed to get x(t) = (exp^(-\zeta\omegat))*((a1(cos\omega*t) + i sin (\omega*t))+(a2(cos\omega*t) - i sin (\omega*t))) then when i simplify things...sin terms cancel out and i end up geting...

exponential term * (a1+a2) * (2cos \omega*t)

No, the sine terms do not cancel out. You have the following.

x(t)=e^{-\zeta\omega t}\left[(a_1+a_2)\cos\left(\omega\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}t\right)+(a_1-a_2)\sin\left(\omega\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}t\right)\right].

The only way the sine term will vanish is if a_1=a_2, and you did not say that that is the case in your problem statement.
 
Tom Mattson said:
Hi,

Is the \zeta a constant here?



No, the sine terms do not cancel out. You have the following.

x(t)=e^{-\zeta\omega t}\left[(a_1+a_2)\cos\left(\omega\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}t\right)+(a_1-a_2)\sin\left(\omega\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}t\right)\right].

The only way the sine term will vanish is if a_1=a_2, and you did not say that that is the case in your problem statement.

Hello. It is a constant.
Yeah, I figured out that I made a mistake.

that's as far as i can go but i need to combine that into sin like I've posted above.

thanks for the reply!

And, there should be a bracket infront of "sqrt" so exponential part it outside the whole thing.

[edit] I think I got it...Thank you very much! :)
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top