Describe the optimum temperature and pressure conditions for these reactions

Thread starter afcwestwarrior
Start date Apr 3, 2007
Tags

Conditions Pressure Reactions Temperature

AI Thread Summary

The optimum temperature and pressure conditions for the reactions 2CO (g) + O2 (g) → 2CO2 (g) and 2NO (g) → N2(g) + O2 (g) are typically around 25 degrees Celsius and 1 atm pressure. To determine these conditions, one can reference thermodynamic data and reaction kinetics, which may require looking up values online or consulting chemistry textbooks. The ideal conditions often depend on the specific reaction and desired yield. Understanding the principles of Le Chatelier's principle can also aid in optimizing conditions. Accurate data is essential for predicting reaction behavior effectively.

Apr 3, 2007

afcwestwarrior

2CO (g) + O2 (g) → 2CO2 (g)

2NO (g) → N2(g) + O2 (g)

what do i have to do, so i have to say the best temperature is at 25 celcius and at 1 atm, how do i figure this out is their a way, or i have to look it up on the internet

Physics news on Phys.org

Apr 3, 2007

afcwestwarrior

here's an example answer, it is 25 celcius and at 1 atm

Apr 3, 2007

afcwestwarrior

so do i need a formula or something for this problem

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »