Describing Physical Events with Spacetime Points

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terminology
latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm trying to convey that all physical events occur at a point in spacetime describing the position and time at which they occur but it's for a presentation and there's not much room on the slides so I need to keep it brief.
At the moment I have:
"Any physical event can be described by a point in spacetime."
But it just occurred to me that this is perhaps not the best as the point in spacetime doesn't actually descirbe the event. For example, if some electromagnetic interaction were to occur, the point in spacetime would tell us the where and when this event happens but not what the actual content of the event is.

Can someone suggest a more succinct way of putting this please.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I would separate spacetime and change the opening words so that it says, "Any physical situation that can be described by a certain location in space and time is called an event" or something similar to that. The important part, I think, would be separating "spacetime" into "space and time."

EDIT: I'm a horrible writer, completely neglected the word "that"
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top