Design a electromagnetic set-up for alternating motion of magnetic particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing an electromagnetic setup with AC input to achieve linear alternating motion of magnetic particles. Key considerations include the mechanics of the particles, fluid dynamics if suspended, and the need to pre-compensate the magnetic field for particle inertia and viscosity to achieve desired linearity. The challenges of electromagnet design are highlighted, particularly regarding current requirements and frequency limitations due to inductive effects. Suggestions include using multiple electromagnets with varying wave functions to create diverse magnetic fields, and references to past successful systems demonstrate the feasibility of such designs. Overall, achieving effective alternating motion in magnetic particles requires careful planning and consideration of multiple engineering factors.
alwaysphoenix
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I want to design an electromagnetic set-up with AC input using which I can have a liner alternating motion in magnetic particles under the application of the field. I thought of having the AC input because the alternating current in the electromagnet can produce quick polarity changes in the magnetic field and the magnetic particles will move with the alternating field, resulting in a linear alternating motion.

I want suggestions and advice with the design or any related issues I have to know for this.

Looking forward to have fruitful discussions soon!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Not so trivial. First you have to consider the mechanics of the particles and if the particles are suspended in a fluid, the fluid dynamics of the suspension. Naturally this also gives you additional information about the B-field spec needed.

Even if you apply the "ideal" magnetic field of a triangle wave, you'll not get linear motion because of things like particle inertia and viscosity of the fluid. What you'd likely need to do is determine these mechanical effects and then pre-compensate the B field accordingly. The current-coil-field-particle-motion system is like a 2-port.

This assumes you have a particular specification for linearity of particle motion/alignment. If you are simply assuming you need it, you are already making a mistake, most likely. The effort to create linearity is sufficient to justify knowing for sure first. Otherwise, don't worry about the linearity and just throw any B-field waveform you can generate at it. Only don't expect high frequency and high field at the same time.

The next issue is that electromagnets require current. Lots of current. Add to this that the electromagnetic coils are inductors and you quickly set a shockingly low upper bound to frequency. This is limited by L di/dt effects combined with the fastest possible slew rates you can get from high power linear amplifiers. A system I worked on had a maximum bandwidth of 10-15 Hz due to this effect. This was with state-of-the-art high power linear amps driving 300 A per coil at peak B field less than 1T.

I've worked on custom high linearity, high field ohmic electromagnets and the design challenges are significant even for someone like me (30 years EE experience).
 
Thanks for the reply.

The magnetic particles will be attached to surfaces and the idea is to create a linear motion on the magnetic particles with an effort to make them separate out from the surface. Though, the motion can be non-linear too, its not important.

The main issue with me is designing the setup so that I can have the alternating motion on the particles by application of electric field, which will result in magnetic field. This won't be possible just by alternating the magnetic field, as the magnetic particles will always be moving towards the coil, and not to and fro.

Won't it be possible with multiple electromagnets and having a different wave function electric current pass through the magnets? This can result in varying magnetic fields in different directions across the magnetic particles at different timepoints.

What do you think?
 
Last edited:
About 12 years ago, a group at General Atomics and LANL developed a ferrite magnet system using IGBTs that produced a ± 500 Gauss triangular waveform field at about 500 Hz. The IGBT circuit required about 1 kW of power, and produced about 30 kVA of peak inductive power that cycled between the magnet and a storage capacitor. See

http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/AccelConf/p99/PAPERS/FRA160.PDF
http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/AccelConf/l98/PAPERS/TU4089.PDF

The IGBT H-bridge applied a V0 = ±300-volt square wave to the magnet, and the magnet current was a ±100-amp triangular wave form, based on the relation dI/dt = V0/L.

This alternating polarity triangular waveform magnetic field could accelerate magnetic monopoles, but none have been found. This spacially-uniform field will not accelerate magnetic dipoles.

Similar time-dependent (actually 60-Hz sine wave) magnetic fields have been used in particle accelerators called betatrons (based on the Faraday induction principle) to accelerate electrons up to energies of many million volts.

Bob S
 
Last edited:
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Back
Top