I Designing an Invariant Lagrangian: Rules and Considerations

Click For Summary
A good Lagrangian should be a function of position and its first-order derivatives, as only two initial conditions are needed to predict a particle's future. The action must be a scalar to ensure consensus on the particle's trajectory, and high-order derivatives should be avoided to prevent non-locality. Generalized coordinates must be appropriately included, along with constraints that relate them. Additionally, the action must remain invariant under Galilei or Poincaré transformations, depending on whether Newtonian or relativistic mechanics is being considered. These principles are essential for designing an effective invariant Lagrangian.
accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
What are the rules for writing a good Lagrangian?
I know that it should be a function of the position and its first order derivatives, because we know that we only need 2 initial conditions (position and velocity) to uniquely determine the future of the particle.
I know that the action has to be a scalar because everyone has to agree on the trajectory the particle travels.
I know that high-order derivatives must be avoided to avoid non-locality.
What else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be sure to include the appropriate generalized coordinates and list the constraints relating them.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71, Delta2 and accdd
In addition to the very general properties you listed, you should make the action (or more precisely the first variation of the action) invariant under Galilei (Newtonian mechanics) or Poincare (special relativistic mechanics) transformations.
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Let us take the Ampere-Maxwell law $$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0\,\mathbf{J}+\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ Assume we produce a spark that is so fast that the ##\partial \mathbf{E}/\partial t## term in eqn.##(1)## has not yet been produced by Faraday’s law of induction $$\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ since the current density ##\mathbf{J}## has not yet had time to generate the magnetic field ##\mathbf{B}##. By...