Designing/Finding Something that Sinks Slowly

  • Thread starter Thread starter DivineProdigy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around creating an object that sinks at a controlled rate of 1 cm per second to reach a depth of 100 cm in 100 seconds. Initial attempts with a water bottle and rocks resulted in increased sinking speed due to momentum, while a glass container with small rocks also failed to maintain a slow descent. Suggestions include using materials like polypropylene, which has a specific gravity just above water, and modifying the object's shape to enhance drag. Ideas such as using a balloon to adjust buoyancy and incorporating ballast for stability were proposed. Understanding fluid mechanics and experimenting with design shapes are emphasized as key factors in achieving the desired sinking rate.
DivineProdigy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need to create an object that will sink 100 cm in 100 seconds. The closer, the better. This means that it needs to be sinking at the rate of 1cm/second, if it is constant (although it is not possible), and it needs to be just slightly more dense than water.

I've tried a water bottle with rocks and water in it, but it increases in momentum too fast and too much (not sure if that was the correct term). It begins at the rate of .5cm per second, but then after about 10cm, it goes at the rate of 3cm/second. If I remove the slightest of water (just a drop), it floats.

I also tried a glass container, and kept adding small rocks (very small). However, the same thing happened. The glass container started off sinking very slowly, but then picked up speed very fast. I know that is how gravity works, but how else am I supposed to accomplish this? Perhaps the shape?

Carrying on, I attached a CD on the lid of the glass container, with the water and the rocks. I was able to get to about 60cm in 45 seconds, but when I tried again, it sank in about 20cm...

My next idea is to use a balloon, and filling it up with water, and adding/subtracting air.


Any ideas? This project is simply a HIGH SCHOOL experiment challenge, so it may not be very difficult.

Thank you.
PS, I am not sure if this is in the correct section (perhaps the Physics?). Would be appreciated if someone would come to aid.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have several problems with trying to balance air and weight.
The air compresses and get less buoyant.
Think about something like a polypropylene with a SG of .94.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polypropylene
It floats low in the water, because of it's SG, add a little weight, to offset.
Read up on slow sinking fishing lures.
I think the weebles toy is made out of PP.
 
Try a soda bottle sand put four holes around the circumference ant up the side at 2cm intervals it should sink slow enough also put play dough (us equilevant) at the bottom for constant weight look up ballest in a submarine for more information
 
Last edited:
DivineProdigy said:
I need to create an object that will sink 100 cm in 100 seconds. The closer, the better. This means that it needs to be sinking at the rate of 1cm/second, if it is constant (although it is not possible), and it needs to be just slightly more dense than water.

I've tried a water bottle with rocks and water in it, but it increases in momentum too fast and too much (not sure if that was the correct term). It begins at the rate of .5cm per second, but then after about 10cm, it goes at the rate of 3cm/second. If I remove the slightest of water (just a drop), it floats.

I also tried a glass container, and kept adding small rocks (very small). However, the same thing happened. The glass container started off sinking very slowly, but then picked up speed very fast. I know that is how gravity works, but how else am I supposed to accomplish this? Perhaps the shape?

Carrying on, I attached a CD on the lid of the glass container, with the water and the rocks. I was able to get to about 60cm in 45 seconds, but when I tried again, it sank in about 20cm...

My next idea is to use a balloon, and filling it up with water, and adding/subtracting air.


Any ideas? This project is simply a HIGH SCHOOL experiment challenge, so it may not be very difficult.

Thank you.
PS, I am not sure if this is in the correct section (perhaps the Physics?). Would be appreciated if someone would come to aid.

Welcome to the PF.

Could you post the exact problem statement from the project assignment? What constraints are put on the device? Can it be intelligent and powered?
 
Some dimensions of your device would be helpful for the following conjecture. I suspect a problem might be the fact that your hydro static pressure is increasing with increasing depth thereby increasing the acceleration as you descend below the water. This would only be true for tall, slender containers though. I am not sure if my reasoning is correct on this one.

Another problem may be that as you decent closer to the surface the momentum of the water in front of the body will tend to move around it. more simply the vector field direction will be less normal to the surface of the object. As you get close the floor you get a pseudo "casimir effect" which will "suck" the object quickly to the surface. This is caused by a pressure differential between the top and bottom of the body. Look up some basic fluid mechanics. That may help you get started.

I suspect a small part of your problem comes from the shape of your design. The highest drag shape would ideally be disc-like (large surface area. small width), with a low aspect ratio (low ratio of length to height) with sharp corners.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top