Desperate: Residual activity of daughter in decay

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical modeling of radioactive decay, specifically the residual activity of a daughter product derived from a parent material. The key equations referenced are A_{1}(t) = A_{10}e^{-\lambda_{1}t} and A_{2}(t) = \frac{\lambda_{1A}}{\lambda_1}\frac{\lambda_{2}}{(\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1})}A_{1}(t)(1-e^{-(\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1})(t-t_{1})}. The user expresses difficulty in reconciling the residual activities of the daughter product with the parent material's decay, noting discrepancies in the presence of decay constants. The conclusion drawn is that separating the daughter product does not affect the overall decay process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay principles
  • Familiarity with decay constants and their significance
  • Knowledge of exponential functions in the context of decay
  • Ability to manipulate and sum mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Bateman equation for multiple decay chains
  • Learn about the implications of radioactive decay in practical applications
  • Explore advanced topics in nuclear physics related to decay products
  • Investigate the mathematical techniques for solving differential equations in decay scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students of nuclear physics, researchers in radioactive materials, and professionals involved in radiological safety and decay analysis will benefit from this discussion.

tramar
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider harvesting a radioactive daughter product from a radioactive parent at regular intervals of time, \theta. If n samples of accumulated daughter product are removed at time \theta, 2\theta, ..., n\theta, show that the sum of their residual activities at time n\theta is just that which would have accumulated in the parent material had no separations been made.

Homework Equations


A_{1}(t)=A_{10}e^{-\lambda_{1}t}
A_{2}(t)=\frac{\lambda_{1A}}{\lambda_1}\frac{\lambda_{2}}{(\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1})}A_{1}(t)(1-e^{-(\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1})(t-t_{1})})

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to take the equation for A_{2}(t) given above and perform a sum from \theta all the way to n\theta for all of the residual activities. I tried to reduce that expression down so that it gave me A_{1}(t) but it seems impossible for the following reasons:

1) You end up left with the factor \frac{\lambda_{1A}}{\lambda_1}\frac{\lambda_{2}}{(\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1})} on the left side and it is not on the right side.
2) The equation for A_{1}(t) has no \lambda_{2}, so I don't see how it can possibly equal any residual activity of the daughter.

This leads me to believe that I've interpreted the problem statement incorrectly...
If anyone can give me some insight, it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The quantity of the daughter at time t is A_1(0) \frac {\lambda_1 } { \lambda_2 - \lambda_1} (e^{- \lambda_1 t} - e^{- \lambda_2 t})

I don't see how you get that expression for A_2(t). What is the amount of the parent left at the time of removing batch k?. What is the amount of daughter in batch k at the time of its removal? The amount of daughter left in batch k after time n \theta

It seems all a rather pointless exercise, since it doesn't matter at all for radioactive decay if you separate the atoms in batches.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K