Destructive Interference of a sheet of mica

AI Thread Summary
To achieve destructive interference for light reflecting off a mica sheet on glass, the thickness of the mica must be calculated using the formula t = (wavelength/n)/4. For a wavelength of 420 nm in air and a refractive index of 1.5 for mica, the thickness should be t = (420 nm / 1.5) / 4, resulting in a thickness of 70 nm. The confusion arose from incorrectly using the refractive index of glass instead of mica in the calculations. The key point is that the thickness must ensure that the optical path difference between the two reflecting rays leads to destructive interference. Proper application of the formulas is essential for accurate results.
conniechiwa
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sheet of mica sits on glass (n = 1.8). How thick should the sheet of mica (n = 1.5) be if it is to be as thin as possible and still give rise to destructive interference for reflection of light in the blue part of the spectrum (use l = 420 nm)? (All parts of the mica except the bottom surface are still surrounded by air.)


Homework Equations


1/2 + 2t/(wavelength/n) = m
2t/(wavelength/n) = 1/2
t = (wavelength/n)/4


The Attempt at a Solution


t = (wavelength/n)/4
t = (420nm/1.8/)4
t = 58.3 nm

I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi conniechiwa,

conniechiwa said:

Homework Statement


A sheet of mica sits on glass (n = 1.8). How thick should the sheet of mica (n = 1.5) be if it is to be as thin as possible and still give rise to destructive interference for reflection of light in the blue part of the spectrum (use l = 420 nm)? (All parts of the mica except the bottom surface are still surrounded by air.)


Homework Equations


1/2 + 2t/(wavelength/n) = m
2t/(wavelength/n) = 1/2
t = (wavelength/n)/4


The Attempt at a Solution


t = (wavelength/n)/4
t = (420nm/1.8/)4
t = 58.3 nm

I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong...

The interference comes about from considering two rays of light: one reflects off the air/mica interface (not entering the mica), and the other enters the mica and reflects off the mica/glass interface.

The n in the formula is due to the fact that the wavelength in the mica is smaller than the wavelength in air. Do you see what you did wrong in the above work?
 
Yeah I get it now. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top