Destructive Interference with Different Wave Shapes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the interaction of an upright square pulse and an inverted triangular pulse on a spring. The key principle at play is superposition, which states that the total displacement at any point is the sum of the individual displacements from each pulse. Since the triangular pulse has a smaller area than the square pulse, it will not dominate the square pulse; instead, their heights will partially cancel each other out due to their opposite signs. Participants clarify that when sketching the spring at the moment of overlap, the heights of the pulses should be added together, resulting in a net effect that reflects their combined contributions. Understanding this principle is crucial for accurately depicting wave interactions.
msimard8
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Here is the question


An upright square pulse and an inverted triangular pulse were directed toward each other on a spring, as shown in the illustration. Sketch the appearance of the spring at the instant the two pulses met and completely overlapped. What principle did you use in constructing the shape of the spring for the instant at which the two pulses met? What does this principle state about how waves combine?

i couldn't get the picture in but i think the questions explain it enough

I am assuming the triangle and the square have the same base and height length. I know a triangle is bh\2. Therefore it is smaller than the square. Does this mean the sqaure takes over the triangle like this:

a small square above the string.


What principle is this


thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
msimard8 said:
Here is the question
An upright square pulse and an inverted triangular pulse were directed toward each other on a spring, as shown in the illustration. Sketch the appearance of the spring at the instant the two pulses met and completely overlapped. What principle did you use in constructing the shape of the spring for the instant at which the two pulses met? What does this principle state about how waves combine?
--->
______
| |
| | <----
------------ ----------------\ /----------------
\ /
\/
I am assuming the triangle and the square have the same base and height length. I know a triangle is bh\2. Therefore it is smaller than the square. Does this mean the sqaure takes over the triangle like this:
_____
| |
----------- ---------
What principle is this
thanks

I'm sorry I have difficulty understanding your drawings, but I believe that what is going on is that you have two pulses on a tight spring traveling towards one another. I believe the word you are looking for to describe the method you would use to sketch the solution is "superposition". This principle says that you can simply add the contributions of each pulse at every point to get the total solution. So what you've got to do is add the height of the triangle to that of the square. Since the hiegts have opposite signs they will tend to reduce each other rather than reinforce each other.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top