Determinants and parallelepiped

  • Thread starter Thread starter kristo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinants
kristo
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For the determinant <br /> \left| \begin{array}{ccc} a_1 &amp; a_2 &amp; a_3 \\ b_1 &amp; b_2 &amp; b_3 \\ c_1 &amp; c_2 &amp; c_3 \end{array} \right| <br /> , b and c being the base of a parallelepiped
why is the equation \vec b \cdot (a_1^{&#039;}e_1 + a_2^{&#039;} e_2 + a_3^{&#039;} e_3) = 0 (same goes for vector c) true? Where a' is a minor of the determinant and e a unit vector.


The Attempt at a Solution


Well, it makes sense algebraically, but as to the geometrical interpretation, I don't really understand it. The vector a'e is is supposedly perpendicular to vector b and also c, but how come?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
consider the determinant method for calculating a cross product...

if you still don't get it try writing out what the minors are...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top