Determination of the enthelpy of combustion of Magnesium using Hess's law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the enthalpy of combustion for the reaction of magnesium with oxygen using Hess's law. The user conducted experiments to determine temperature changes for two reactions involving magnesium and hydrochloric acid, leading to calculated enthalpy changes of -405 kJ/mol and -318 kJ/mol, respectively. By applying Hess's law, they derived an enthalpy of -372.8 kJ/mol for the combustion of magnesium, which contradicts the commonly accepted value of approximately 602 kJ/mol. The discrepancy suggests potential experimental errors, possibly due to the use of Styrofoam insulators. The conversation highlights the importance of accuracy in experimental setups to align results with established data.
Sekminara
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



ok so I'm trying to find the change in enthalpy for this reaction:
Mg(s) + (1/2)O2--> MgO(s)

I've done the lab to find the temperatures of certain reactions, these were:
9.70 Celsius for the reaction Mg(s) + 2HCl(aq)--> MgCl2(aq) + H2(l)

7.60 Celsius for the reaction MgO(s) + 2HCl --> MgCl2(aq) + H2O(l) reaction

(and we know the enthalpy of change for the reaction
H2(g) + (1/2)O2(g) --> H2O(l) is 285.8 kJ)

Homework Equations



change in enthalpy = mass (100ml/1000ml) * specific heat (4.18) * change in temp (above)

The Attempt at a Solution



using the (above) equation i found that the enthalpy of change for the first reaction was -405 kJ per mol and the second was -318 kJ per mol.

so i built a Hess's law chart and found that [Mg(s) + 2HCl(aq)--> MgCl2(aq) + H2(l)] + [H2(g) + (1/2)O2(g) --> H2] = [MgO(s) + 2HCl --> MgCl2(aq) + H2O(l)] + [Mg(s) + (1/2)O2--> MgO(s)]

so basically the equation look like this: -405 + (-285.8) = -318 + x

therefore x should be -372.8 kJ per mol

but all the answers I've found on the net so far say that the enthalpy of combustion is approximately 602 kJ per mol

help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
-372.8 kJ/mol agrees with your experimental data, so if it doesn't agree with tables - you have to look for experimental error.
 
dang...ouch 38% error

well...i guess that's what you get when you use Styrofoam insulators...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top