Determine how high the ball is (from the ground)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demonsthenes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Ground
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a third baseman throwing a ball to first base, measuring 38 meters away, with an initial speed of 36 m/s at a height of 1.7 meters and an angle of 14 degrees. The trajectory of the ball is modeled as a parabolic function, leading to a calculated height of approximately 5.57 meters when it reaches first base. This height indicates that the ball is significantly above the average human catch height of 1.8 meters. Consequently, the throw is deemed unsuccessful as the ball would not be catchable. The calculations confirm that the ball reaches its peak just past the first base, reinforcing the conclusion of an unsuccessful catch.
Demonsthenes
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
My professor decided to throw us a curveball to try and solve the following problem:

A third baseman makes a throw to first base 38m away. The ball leaves his hand with a speed of 36m/s at a height of 1.7 meters from the ground and making an angle of 14 degrees with the horizontal.

a) Determine how high the ball is (from the ground) when it gets to the first base.
b) Is the throw successful

No equations given.

My shot at the problem

a) It would be a parabolic function because of its projectile nature. Thus the equation using H,R is y=a(x-1/2R)^2 + H. where a = -g/2(V0)cos^2(theta).

First i solved R:
R=Vo^2(sin(2theta))/g
=(36m/s)^2(sin(28))/9.8m/s2
= 62.085m

Then i solved for H
I used h as H-1.7 due to the fact that the curve only applies to that area over the basemans arm to the next point where H = 1.7.

h=Vo^2(sin^2(theta))/2g
h=(36m/s)^2(sin^2(14))/19.6m/s2
h=3.87 + 1.7= H= 5.57

So here's the parabolic function now:

y= (-(9.8m/s2)/2(36m/s)^2(cos^2(14deg)))(x-.5(62.085m))+ 5.57m
y= (-.004 no units)(x-31.0425m)+5.57m
f(38 [length from 3rd to 1st baseman]) = (-.004*6.9575)+5.57 {m}
f(28) = 5.54217 m above the base.

So therefore i got the answer to b) being that no, the catch wasn't made because the ball is three times higher than a normal human height (1.8m), thus the catch was not made.

Hopefully i can get help with this... i appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Checking by a different method, by calculating the horizontal and vertical velocity components: 36 sin (14) & 36 cos (14) , we can see from the results that the ball gets to first base in just over a second, just past the top of it's arc. That's only halfway toward calculating the final height, but certainly it would not be catchable.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top