Determine if set is a vector space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining whether the set of all pairs of real numbers of the form (1,x) constitutes a vector space under specified operations. The operations defined are (1,y)+(1,y')=(1,y+y') and k(1,y)=(1,ky). Key points of contention include the existence of a zero vector and the additive inverse. The conclusion reached is that while the conventional zero vector (0,0) is not present in this set, a zero vector can still exist under the defined operations, and the additive inverse must be computed using the specified addition operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector space axioms
  • Familiarity with operations on ordered pairs
  • Knowledge of real number properties
  • Basic linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces in linear algebra
  • Learn about alternative definitions of zero vectors in non-standard vector spaces
  • Explore the concept of additive inverses in vector spaces
  • Investigate examples of vector spaces defined by non-traditional operations
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, educators teaching vector space concepts, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical structures and their properties.

Laura1321412
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Q) Determine if the set is a vector space under the given operations

The set of all pairs of real numbers of the form (1,x) with the operations (1,y)+(1,y')=(1,y+y') and k(1,y)=(1,ky)


2. Homework Equations / Solution Attempt

I know the axioms needed in this case, and I believe most all of them hold. The ones I am having trouble with in particular are

> There is an object 0 in V called the zero vector such that 0+u= u.
- But there isn't a zero vector if V is defined by (1,x) right?

> For each u in V there is an object -u in V, such that -u + u =0
- But -u would equal (1,-x) + (1,x) = (2,0) -- not 0


However, in the answer section of my book it says that this is a vector space under the given operations. I can't understand how the two above axioms hold... Any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Laura1321412 said:
> There is an object 0 in V called the zero vector such that 0+u= u.
- But there isn't a zero vector if V is defined by (1,x) right?

> For each u in V there is an object -u in V, such that -u + u =0
- But -u would equal (1,-x) + (1,x) = (2,0) -- not 0

First: There must be a zero vector, but the only property the zero vector needs to have is that 0 + u = u + 0 = u for every u \in V -- using the definition of + you are given. In other words, you shouldn't necessarily expect the zero vector to be (0, 0). In fact, as you point out, (0, 0) \notin V.

Second: Be careful -- when you compute -u + u, what definition of + should you be using?
 
You can (and should) use the report button to request that your other thread be deleted. (I also agree with what ystael said).
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K