Determine the moment of the force about point O

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of a force about point O, using a force of 500N split into its horizontal and vertical components. The moment is computed as M = (353.55*5.12) - (353.55*2.12), resulting in a value of 1060.65 Nm, which is confirmed to be correct. Participants emphasize the importance of clearly indicating conventions and units in calculations, noting that the torque direction is counter-clockwise. An alternative approach simplifies the calculation by recognizing that the vertical moment arm is zero, leading to a straightforward calculation of 3.00 * 353.55 = 1060.65 Nm. The consensus acknowledges the correctness of the calculations while discussing torque direction nuances.
sHatDowN
Messages
52
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
Determine the moment of the force about point O.
Relevant Equations
M = F.d
1681486447153.png


There are components of 500N:

500cos(45)= 353.55
500sin(45)= 353.55

Radius is 3 then

1681486862134.png


M = (353.55*5.12) - (353.55*2.12) = 1060.65is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sHatDowN said:
Homework Statement: Determine the moment of the force about point O.
Relevant Equations: M = F.d

View attachment 324887

There are components of 500N:

500cos(45)= 353.55
500sin(45)= 353.55

Radius is 3 then

View attachment 324888

M = (353.55*5.12) - (353.55*2.12) = 1060.65is that correct?
It's always good practice to show (or state) your convention with the diagram, and show units in computation. Sig figs are probably too many as well. In this case you chose counter-clockwise as positive moment.

Computationally...the calculation is correct.
 
Last edited:
Yes. It's a bit cumbersome that way. More straightforward:
1681490627266.png

The blue vector is ##{1\over 2}r\sqrt 2##. That times the 500 from ##F## is 1061 Nm

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes sHatDowN, erobz and berkeman
erobz said:
It's always good practice to show (or state) your convention with the diagram, and show units in computation. Sig figs are probably too many as well. In this case you chose counter-clockwise as positive moment.

Computationally...the calculation is correct.
Thanks alot.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and erobz
sHatDowN said:
M = (353.55*5.12) - (353.55*2.12) = 1060.65
So you are splitting the applied force into its vertical and horizontal components. You computed the torque from the vertical component by multiplying by the horizontal component of the moment arm for the point of application (5.12, 2.12). By inspection, this is a counter-clockwise torque.

You computed the torque from the horizontal component by multiplying against the horizontal moment arm to the same point of application (5.12, 2.12). This time the torque is clockwise, so it will subtract.

That is a viable approach. Straight, by the book, crank and grind.

The approach that I took was different.

The torque from a given force is the same no matter where that force is applied, as long as the revised point of application is somewhere along the "line of action" of the original force.

The drawing makes it clear that the line of action passes through the point (3.00, 0). That simplifies the math. Now the vertical moment arm is zero and we need only consider the vertical force component of 353.55 and the horizontal moment arm of 3.00:$$3.00 * 353.55 = 1060.65$$By inspection, this is a clockwise counter-clockwise torque.
 
Last edited:
jbriggs444 said:
The drawing makes it clear that the line of action passes through the point (3.00, 0). That simplifies the math. Now the vertical moment arm is zero and we need only consider the vertical force component of 353.55 and the horizontal moment arm of 3.00:By inspection, this is a clockwise torque.
I think you wrong it's counter-clouckwise becuase in this case when we applied a force horizontal it's counter-clouckwise.

1681499154933.png
 
sHatDowN said:
it's counter-clockwise
I agree.
 
sHatDowN said:
I think you wrong it's counter-clouckwise becuase in this case when we applied a force horizontal it's counter-clouckwise.
You are right, of course.
 
  • Like
Likes sHatDowN and berkeman
Back
Top