Determine the partial pressure of gas at equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
To determine the partial pressure of phosgene at equilibrium, the initial pressure of 1.31 atm is adjusted by subtracting the pressure of 0.497 atm of CO, highlighting that the stoichiometric ratios in the reaction are not equal. The confusion arises from interpreting the balanced equation CO(g) + Cl2(g) ⇋ COCl2(g) as having a 1:1:1 ratio, which is incorrect when considering the changes in moles during the reaction. The equilibrium pressures must reflect the actual mole changes, leading to a situation where the total does not equal 100%. Understanding that the dissociation of gases affects their partial pressures is crucial for accurate calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying stoichiometric relationships in equilibrium problems.
ohms law
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I figured out the answer to this already, but I wanted help on the reasoning behind it:
ScreenHunter_05 Oct. 19 17.29.jpg


In order to work out the problem we're supposed to determine the partial pressure of phosgene by subtracting 0.497 atm worth from the initial pressure of 1.31 atm (determined by using the ideal gas equation). My question is... why? I mean, if there's 0.497 atm of CO(g) and the stoichiometric ratios of the balanced equation are 1:1:1, then why aren't all three gases at 0.497 atm?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the stoichiometric ratios are not 1:1:1.

If they were, the equilibrium constant would be equal to 1/(partial pressure of any of the three gases) -- and that could not be a constant!

You need to think differently about what the meaning of the stoichiometric equation might be.
 
...huh?
If the balanced equation is CO_{(g)} + Cl_{2(g)} ⇋ COCl_{2(g)}, then how is the relationship not 1:1:1? The equation outright says that there's 1 mol of COCl2, 1 mol of CO, and 1 mol of Cl2.
:confused:
 
The next question is basically the same type of question, too:
ScreenHunter_06 Oct. 19 19.14.jpg


The first part of the answer is:
ScreenHunter_07 Oct. 19 19.14.jpg


So, I'm confused about the same thing here, essentially (well... very similar, at least). In the answer, the equilibrium pressures add up to 117% (0.66+0.34+0.17=1.17). I don't understand how that's possible.

If 34% of the initial gas dissociates, then 66% is still NOBr (that much we seem to agree on, at least). Doesn't that mean that 34% will be a combination of 1 part NO and 1/2 part of Br2? (because we're using percent compositions here) I'd think that if 66% is NOBr, then 22.666% would be NO, and 11.333% would be Br2.
 
ohms law said:
...huh?
If the balanced equation is CO_{(g)} + Cl_{2(g)} ⇋ COCl_{2(g)}, then how is the relationship not 1:1:1? The equation outright says that there's 1 mol of COCl2, 1 mol of CO, and 1 mol of Cl2.
:confused:

If you start out with y mol of phosgene, then what the balanced equation tells you is that when x mol of it react to produce carbon monoxide and chlorine, the number of mole of the three substances will be y – x , x , and x respectively. That is not a 1:1:1 ratio!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top