Determine the potential energy function of the charged particle

AI Thread Summary
To determine the potential energy function of a charged particle, one must integrate the force function f(x) and take the negative of that integral, resulting in U(x). The problem emphasizes stating any assumptions, particularly regarding the nature of the charge distribution. For an infinitely long linear charge, the potential cannot be defined as zero at infinity due to its uniformity from any distance. The discussion suggests considering how the potential would change if the wire had a finite length, highlighting that the potential approaches a specific value as distance increases. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining potential energy in electrostatics.
SLTH02
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The electrostatic force repelling a charged particle from a long, straight, uniformly charged rod is given by
the equation F = 100 x ^ (-1) where x is the distance from the rod.
Relevant Equations
F = -(dU)/(dx)
I understand that you need to integrate f(x), and the negative of that is U(x).

But the last part of the problem says "Clearly state any assumptions you make."

And the answer is just the antiderivative of that f(x) without any constant from integrationHow does that make sense
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good observation. You might insert the actual question in the homework statement, but I gather the exercise asks for 'the' potential energy function.

Such a function is in fact determined to within a constant (we don't observe potentials, only forces ...) . Usually we take the potential to be zero at infinity, but in this case that can not be done: a consequence of assuming the linear charge is itself infinitely long.
 
BvU said:
a consequence of assuming the linear charge is itself infinitely long.
So what would happen if the linear charge is infinitely long?
 
An infinitely long wire looks the same from any distance,

A better question is: what would change if the wire had finite length
(nice exercise: check that ##V\rightarrow {Q\over {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} } ## for ##d\rightarrow \infty## )
 
  • Like
Likes SLTH02
BvU said:
An infinitely long wire looks the same from any distance,

A better question is: what would change if the wire had finite length
(nice exercise: check that ##V\rightarrow {Q\over {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} } ## for ##d\rightarrow \infty## )
Got it. thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top