Determine the rate of emission of quanta from the station

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rate of emission of quanta from a radio station operating at 103.7 MHz with a power output of 200 kW. The first part of the problem was solved by determining the energy of a single photon, resulting in a rate of 2.91 x 10^30 quanta per second. For the second part, participants discussed finding the number of photons in a cubical volume 20 cm on a side, located 15 km away from the station, with calculations leading to an approximate value of 2.74 x 10^10 photons. The conversation also included clarifications on calculating intensity, energy density, and photon density, enhancing understanding of these concepts. Overall, the thread provided insights into photon emission and density related to radio frequency power output.
queenstudy
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A radio station operates at a frequency 103.7MHz with a power output of 200kW.
1)Determine the rate of emission of quanta from the station.
2)If we treat the radio station as a point source radiatng uniformly in all directions, find the number of photons inside a cubical radio 20cm on a side located 15km away from the radio station

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


1) i solved it by finding the energy of one photon and then N/t= 200000/Energy of one photon =2.91 *10^30 quanta/s
2) I thought that the power i have should be multiplied by 4∏d^2 / a^2 where a is the side of the radio and d is the distance from the source to the radio box and then i have the time needed to reach the dario which is d/c so the number of photons is to be 2.75*10^10 photons but it didnt please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
queenstudy said:

Homework Statement



A radio station operates at a frequency 103.7MHz with a power output of 200kW.
1)Determine the rate of emission of quanta from the station.

1) i solved it by finding the energy of one photon and then N/t= 200000/Energy of one photon =2.91 *10^30 quanta/s
Didn't check your math, but the argument is correct.

2)If we treat the radio station as a point source radiatng uniformly in all directions, find the number of photons inside a cubical radio 20cm on a side located 15km away from the radio station

2) I thought that the power i have should be multiplied by 4∏d^2 / a^2 where a is the side of the radio and d is the distance from the source to the radio box and then i have the time needed to reach the dario which is d/c so the number of photons is to be 2.75*10^10 photons but it didnt please help
Not sure how did you get the "size of the radio". But dividing the power by the area of the sphere of radius d, you get power per area (Intensity):
I = P/A
Intensity is related to energy density u (energy per volume) and speed v of photon by:
I = u v
From energy density, you can calculate photon density. Then using the volume of the radio, you can compute the number of photons. I got 2.74e10 photons.
 
that is the exact answer thank you mathfeel
 
mathfeel said:
Didn't check your math, but the argument is correct.


Not sure how did you get the "size of the radio". But dividing the power by the area of the sphere of radius d, you get power per area (Intensity):
I = P/A
Intensity is related to energy density u (energy per volume) and speed v of photon by:
I = u v
From energy density, you can calculate photon density. Then using the volume of the radio, you can compute the number of photons. I got 2.74e10 photons.

can you tell me how did you calculate the energy density and photon density?
 
queenstudy said:
can you tell me how did you calculate the energy density and photon density?

In my reply #2, I gave two definitions of the same quantity I. By equating them, you can compute u.

u is energy / volume. You also know how much energy is in each photon. So you can get photon / volume.
 
thank you very much i now understand it , the good thing is learning a new concept called photon density
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top