Determining a parameter so that it's a removable singularity

AI Thread Summary
To establish a removable singularity at x=2 for the function f(x) = (ax^2 - 16)/((x-4)(x-2)), the limit as x approaches 2 must exist and be different from f(2). The discussions emphasize that f(2) should be undefined, which aligns with the goal of having a removable singularity. To achieve this, the numerator must contain a factor of (x-2) to cancel with the denominator, allowing the limit to exist. The value of 'a' needs to be determined such that this condition is satisfied, ensuring the function behaves well near x=2.
greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Homework Statement
Determine ##a## so that ##f(x)=\frac{ax^2-16}{x^2-6x+8}## has a removable singularity for ##x=2##
Relevant Equations
none
So, for this exercise I'm considering the removable singularity for ##x=2## to cause ##f(2)## to be different from ##\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)##.
But as soon as I write everything down, I get stuck here: ##\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)\neq\frac{4(a-4)}{0}##
How do I calculate ##a##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-4)(x-2)}=\frac{...?}{x-4}
 
Last edited:
greg_rack said:
So, for this exercise I'm considering the removable singularity for ##x=2## to cause ##f(2)## to be different from ##\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)##.

This isn't what you want. You need the limit to exist. Then, you can remove the singuality by defining ##f(2)## to be the value of the limit.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-4)(x-2)}=\frac{...?}{x-4}
Mmm, I didn't get that... Have you factored the numerator to simplify that ##(x-2)## at the denominator? If yes, why? And how, since there is an ##'a'##?
 
PeroK said:
This isn't what you want. You need the limit to exist. Then, you can remove the singuality by defining ##f(2)## to be the value of the limit.
Wait... I do need a singularity, a so-called "removable" one. If ##f(2)=\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)##, the function would be continuous in 2, and that's not what I want. Correct?

EDIT, from Wikipedia: In analysis, a removable singularity of a function is a point at which the function is undefined.
 
greg_rack said:
Wait... I do need a singularity, a so-called "removable" one. If ##f(2)=\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)##, the function would be continuous in 2, and that's not what I want. Correct?
That is what you want. A removable singularity means the limit exists and allows you to create a continuous function.

Note that whether the ##\lim_{x \rightarrow 2} f(x)## exists does not depend on ##f(2)##.

Whatever you do ##f(2)## cannot be defined by evaluating the given expression. That will always have ##0## on the denominator, hence be undefined.
 
PeroK said:
That is what you want. A removable singularity means the limit exists and allows you to create a continuous function.

Note that whether the ##\lim_{x \rightarrow 2} f(x)## exists does not depend on ##f(2)##.
And so how do I establish ##a##? Which conditions should I use
 
greg_rack said:
And so how do I establish ##a##? Which conditions should I use
The limit must exist. The answer is screaming at you from your original post!
 
greg_rack said:
If yes, why? And how, since there is an ′a′?
Because if (x-2) disappears from denominator you do not have to worry about singularity at x=2.
Find a good value of 'a' so that you can do it.
 
  • Like
Likes greg_rack
  • #10
PeroK said:
The limit must exist. The answer is screaming at you from your original post!
God, I'm feeling so dumb!😂
The limit should therefore exist, independently from what the value of ##f(2)## is, so as @anuttarasammyak said I should find the value of ##a## for which ##\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-4)(x-2)}## exists(?)
 
  • #11
greg_rack said:
The limit should therefore exist, independently from what the value of ##f(2)## is, so as @anuttarasammyak said I should find the value of ##a## for which ##\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-4)(x-2)}## exists(?)
Yes, you need that limit to exist as ##x \rightarrow 2##.
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
Yes, you need that limit to exist as ##x \rightarrow 2##.
Ok then, and what about ##f(2)##? My textbook says it should not exist or at least be different from the value of the limit.
 
  • #13
greg_rack said:
Ok then, and what about ##f(2)##? My textbook says it should not exist or at least be different from the value of the limit.
##f(2)## is undefined if all you have is that formula for ##f(x)##:
$$f(2) = \frac{4a - 16}{0}$$
Which is undefined, no matter what ##a## is. The function you have been given is not defined at ##x =2## or ##x =4##. If we take ##a = 0##, then ##f(x) = \frac{-16}{(x-2)(x-4)}##.

That has non-removable singularities at ##x = 2## and ##x = 4##. This is because the function blows up around ##x = 2## and ##x = 4##. Note that it's the behaviour of the function close to these points that is important.

You need to find some ##a## which makes the function well behaved close to ##x = 2##.
 
  • Informative
Likes greg_rack
  • #14
PeroK said:
You need to find some a which makes the function well behaved close to x=2.
I'm finally getting there! Last easy and merely algebraical question: how do I determine ##a## so that the factor which gives indetermination(##(x-2)##) in $$\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-2)(x-4)}$$ can be simplified?
 
  • #15
greg_rack said:
I'm finally getting there! Last easy and merely algebraical question: how do I determine ##a## so that the factor which gives indetermination(##(x-2)##) in $$\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-2)(x-4)}$$ can be simplified?
What would you like to get rid of from the denominator? What do you need on the numerator?
 
  • #16
PeroK said:
What would you like to get rid of from the denominator? What do you need on the numerator?
I should get rid of ##(x-2)## by having another ##(x-2)## on the numerator, right?
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Back
Top