Determining Extrema for f(x) = x^2 - 8x + 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter scorpa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Extrema
AI Thread Summary
To determine the extrema of the function f(x) = x^2 - 8x + 9 on the interval [-1, 5], the first step is to find stationary points by setting the derivative f'(x) = 2x - 8 to zero, resulting in x = 4. Evaluating the function at this point gives f(4) = -7, which is a potential minimum. The endpoints of the interval, f(-1) and f(5), should also be evaluated to confirm the absolute extrema. The function is a parabola opening upwards, indicating that the minimum occurs at x = 4, while the maximum will be at one of the endpoints. Therefore, both the stationary point and endpoints must be considered to identify the absolute minimum and maximum.
scorpa
Messages
367
Reaction score
1
Hello!

I am doing a question about curve sketching and determining extrema and just need some clarification. Here is the question:

Determine the extreme values of the function f(x) = x^2 - 8x + 9, where
-1 is greater than or equal to x is less than or equal to 5.

This is what I have done so far:

I decided to check for stationary points, as extreme values may occur at f'(0)=0.

f'(x) = 2x-8
2x-8 = 0
x = 4

f(4) = 4^2 - 8(4) +9 = -7
(4,-7) may be a max, min or neither.

f(3.9) = (3.9)^2 - 8(3.9)+9 = -6.99
f(4.1) = (4.1)^2 - 8(4.1)+9 = -6.99

Does this mean that this point cannot be used in determining the absolute minimum? I am totally lost at this point. I was going to use the endpoints given to figure out the maximum, but I'm not sure if that is an acceptable method. Thanks for any help you can give me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the endpoints of the interval as well as x = 4. You are allowed to use the endpoints because they are included in the interval.
 
The function is continuous on the whole domain.It's a parabola.The theory says that the sign of "a" (=1,in this case) decides the nature of the extremum...In this case,it's a minimum...

That's all there's to it.

Daniel.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top