Determining Functions from relations

AI Thread Summary
A relation is classified as a function if each input (x) corresponds to a unique output (y). The repetition of ordered pairs in a set does not affect its classification as a function, as sets are defined by their unique elements. For example, the set {(6,2), (4,3), (5,3), (6,2), (7,3), (2,9)} simplifies to {(6,2), (4,3), (5,3), (7,3), (2,9)}, which is a valid function. It is advisable to avoid writing sets with repeated elements to prevent confusion. Understanding these principles clarifies the distinction between relations and functions.
frozonecom
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
I know that determining functions from relations can be easy.

A relation is a function if every x has a unique y or every first coordinate(domain) of the ordered pair has exactly one second coordinate(range).

What I don't know is if the repetition of an ordered pair affect the set at all. Will it be considered only as a relation? Or perhaps still a function? Here is an example.

{(6,2) , (4,3) , (5,3) , (6,2) , (7,3) , (2,9)}

Notice the repetition of the ordered pair (6,2). So, will it be considered as a function?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi frozonecom! :smile:

Sets are uniquely determined by it's elements regardless of the order of the elements (that is, the set {0,1} is equal to the set {1,0}) and regardless of the multiplicity of the elements. The latter means that sets such as {0,1,1,1,1,1}, where 1 appears 5 times, are actually equal to {0,1}.

A more rigourous argument why {0,1}={0,1,1,1,1,1} is because every element in the left-hand side is in the right-hand side, and conversely.

Thus, in your example, the set {(6,2) , (4,3) , (5,3) , (6,2) , (7,3) , (2,9)} is actually equal to {(6,2) , (4,3) , (5,3) , (7,3) , (2,9)}, and it is thus a function.

An advice is to never write sets such that elements occur more than once. So never write {0,1,1}, but write {0,1}. This eliminated a lot of confusion...
 
Thanks for the quick reply! I was having confusion about the matter. Really appreciate your help! Thanks! :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Back
Top