Determining Half-Life of Element X from Gamma Spectrum: Tips and Challenges

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the half-life of an element (referred to as Element X) from its gamma spectrum, focusing on the challenges and methodologies involved in analyzing gamma peaks and their areas over time. Participants explore various approaches to calculate half-life values based on peak data, uncertainties, and experimental conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents gamma peaks at 800 keV, 1000 keV, and 1200 keV, reporting different half-life values derived from each peak.
  • Another participant suggests measuring only the height of each peak for half-life calculation, asserting that all peaks should decrease at the same rate.
  • Concerns are raised about the compatibility of the reported half-life values, with suggestions to assess the precision of measurements and consider weighted averages if uncertainties differ significantly.
  • One participant mentions that the 1200 keV peak is more intense and questions whether to average all values or prioritize the one with the smallest error.
  • Discussion includes the potential influence of decay products on the measured half-lives and the importance of understanding the decay scheme.
  • Another participant notes the need for consistent data and expresses frustration over hypothetical examples that lack realistic context.
  • One participant clarifies that their initial numbers were illustrative and later provides a different set of half-life values (65 min, 67 min, 66 min) for further discussion.
  • There is a call for clarity on the experimental setup and decay scheme to better understand the discrepancies in half-life measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the reliability of the half-life values obtained from different peaks, with no consensus on which value to prioritize or how to average them. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to analyze the data and the implications of uncertainties.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the precision of measurements, the potential influence of decay products, and the need for a clear understanding of the decay scheme. The discussion also reflects a lack of consistent and realistic data, which complicates the analysis.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for those interested in nuclear physics, gamma spectroscopy, and the methodologies for analyzing decay data, particularly in the context of half-life determination and uncertainty analysis.

sakkoyun
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have a gamma spectrum of one element (X). There are several gamma peak in the spectrum. For example,

800 keV peak, 1000 keV peak and 1200 keV.

I have an information about the peak area changing with time. Namely, I know the peak area in different times. So I can calculate the half life of the element by using the area and time information.

But I have a problem.

I got 15 hours from 800 keV peak.
14 hours from 1000 keV.
16 hours from 1200 keV peak.

Which half-life is correct. What should I do? Which is the most reliable? Should I get average value?

Best wishes
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The widths of different peaks will be different.
Calculate the half-life, by measuring only the height of each peak.
These should all decrease at the same rate.
 
Meir Achuz said:
The widths of different peaks will be different.
Sure, but the widths should not vary with time. And if they did, you could use the height of the peak. There is no absolute value mentioned here, all values are relative.

sakkoyun said:
I got 15 hours from 800 keV peak.
14 hours from 1000 keV.
16 hours from 1200 keV peak.

Which half-life is correct. What should I do? Which is the most reliable? Should I get average value?
You should find some estimate how precise your values are. For example, is your first value "15 hours plus/minus 2 minutes" or "in the range of 13 to 17 hours"? If those three values are compatible within the uncertainties, calculate the average. If the uncertainties differ significantly, a weighted average is better.
If the values are incompatible, it would be interesting to know more about the experiment. Do some lines come from decay products? That can give an activity that deviates from an exponential decay.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you very much.
With the errors, 15 +-0.3
14+-0.1
16+- 0.5

The 1200 keV peak is more intense. The others are small peaks. Will I get an average of all them? Namely, (15+14+16)/3=15. Or, will I get the half-life as 16 due to the fact that 1200 keV is more intense. Or, will I get 14 for half-life due to the fact that this value is smallest error?

Best wishes
 
sakkoyun said:
Will I get an average of all them?

--->

mfb said:
If the uncertainties differ significantly, a weighted average is better.
 
14+-0.1 and 16+- 0.5 are a bit far apart. It would be interesting to see the decay scheme. If there is a physical reason for them to have the same half-life, something went wrong, you were really unlucky (>3 standard deviations) or the uncertainties are non-gaussian.
 
mfb said:
14+-0.1 and 16+- 0.5 are a bit far apart. It would be interesting to see the decay scheme. If there is a physical reason for them to have the same half-life, something went wrong, you were really unlucky (>3 standard deviations) or the uncertainties are non-gaussian.

Zn68 was created after reaction. 3 gamma peak are clear in gamma spectra. 805, 1077 and 1260 keV. After analyzing each three peaks individually, I got three different half-life values. (Analyzing is performed by investigating the peak area with time. And obtaining decay (growth) curve). Which one is more reliable? Or ?
 
Zn68 was created after reaction.
And what did you have before?

Did you identify the gamma energies in a decay scheme?

(Analyzing is performed by investigating the peak area with time. And obtaining decay (growth) curve)
How exactly did you do this?
 
Ga69 was bombarded by 10 MeV photon. A neutron was emiited from Ga69. The unstable Ga68 decayed to Zn68.
 
  • #10
None of those are near the half life of Ga-68. Are you sure you are measuring what you think you are?
 
  • #11
I was choosen the numbers randomly for an illustration. Actually the half lives that I measured are 65 min, 67 min and 66 min.
 
  • #12
I'm afraid by asking people to help you with made up, inconsistent numbers, you ended up wasting people's time. Perhaps it would be better to show us the real numbers.
 
  • #13
My aim is to know the technique with a basic examples. It is not do an article all together. I have no realistic data. Again, I would like to know the technique. Because of someone, I made up an element, a realistic peaks and a realistic half life.
I do not have any of them. Just technique I wonder. A dream I had about this problem. So I ask to get an answer. Thats all.
 
  • #14
sakkoyun said:
Actually the half lives that I measured are 65 min, 67 min and 66 min.

sakkoyun said:
I have no realistic data.

It's difficult to help you if you don't provide consistent information.
 
  • #15
sakkoyun said:
My aim is to know the technique with a basic examples. It is not do an article all together. I have no realistic data. Again, I would like to know the technique. Because of someone, I made up an element, a realistic peaks and a realistic half life.
I do not have any of them. Just technique I wonder. A dream I had about this problem. So I ask to get an answer. Thats all.
The right analysis method depends on all those details you refuse to give.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K