Determining Miles Traveled From Tire Diameter and Rotations.

RidiculousName
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I am trying to figure out how to solve this equation. I have a car with tires of diameter 28", and they rotate 10,000 times. How far did I travel?

According to my textbook it's 13.9 miles.

I can figure it out by finding the circumference of the tire (87.96"), multiplying that by 10,000 (879600), dividing the product by the amount of inches in a mile (63360) to get 13.8826.

But, I am supposed to do it with this formula, $$s=r\theta$$
However, I'm not sure how to do that at all.
It is a formula to find the relation between a linear displacement and an angular displacement.
s = linear displacement
$$\theta$$ = angular displacement (and must be in radian form)
r = radius

I might be supposed to use $$v=r\omega$$
It is a formula to find the relation between a linear velocity and an angular velocity.
v = vertical speed
$$\omega$$ = angular speed (must be in radian form)
r = radius

How can I solve this problem using the formula $$s=r\theta$$?
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
For a complete rotation, [tex]\theta= 2\pi[/tex] radians. For a general angle of [tex]\theta[/tex] there are [tex]\frac{\theta}{2\pi}[/tex] rotations. Given a radius r, the circumference of a full circle is of course [tex]2\pi r[/tex] so that a rotation of [tex]\theta[/tex] radians gives a distance of [tex]2\pi r\frac{\theta}{2\pi}= r \theta[/tex].
 
Country Boy said:
For a complete rotation, [tex]\theta= 2\pi[/tex] radians. For a general angle of [tex]\theta[/tex] there are [tex]\frac{\theta}{2\pi}[/tex] rotations. Given a radius r, the circumference of a full circle is of course [tex]2\pi r[/tex] so that a rotation of [tex]\theta[/tex] radians gives a distance of [tex]2\pi r\frac{\theta}{2\pi}= r \theta[/tex].

Thank you, but I don't understand how that answers my question.
 
"10000 rotations" is [tex]\theta= 10000(2\pi)= 20000\pi[/tex] radians. The distance covered is [tex]\theta r= 20000\pi(14)= 280000\pi=879646[/tex] inches. That's just what you did, just with a slight change in the order of the multiplications. Your first calculated the circumfernce of the wheel, using [tex]2\pi r[/tex] then multiplied by 10000. Using [tex]r\theta[/tex] you first calculate the total angular rotation, [tex]\theta[/b], in radians by multiplying [tex]2\pi[/tex] by 10000, and <b>then</b> multiply by r= 14 in.<br /> <br /> In other words, your method was to first multiply [tex]2\pi r[/tex] then multiply by 10000 while using "[tex]r\theta[/tex]" you first find [tex]\theta[/tex] by multiplying [tex]10000(2\pi)[/tex] and <b>then</b> multiply by r= 14.[/tex]
 
Last edited:
What's wrong with keeping it simple:

u = wheel circumference = pi * 28 inches

10000 revolutions = u * 10000 inches

u * 10000 / (5280*12) = ~13.8833 miles
 
There's nothing wrong with that and, in fact, that was what the OP did. But his question was about using "[tex]r\theta[/tex]" and that was what I was responding to.
 
Last edited:
Yer right CB...should be more careful...
A thousand apologies of which you may have one :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K