Chemistry Determining Number of Moles Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter predentalgirl1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of moles of acetone vapor in a Hickman still using the ideal gas law. The temperature is converted to Kelvin at 343K, and the pressure is adjusted to atmospheric units, resulting in 0.736 atm. The volume of the still is set at 25 mL, converted to liters for the calculation. The final calculation yields approximately 8.59 x 10^-7 moles of acetone vapor, confirming the accuracy of the work presented. The answer is validated as correct.
predentalgirl1
Messages
61
Reaction score
1
Hello. Just need this answer checked. Thanks.

If we can reasonably treat acetone vapor as an ideal gas at the Tboil =70° C and we approximate the volume of a Hickman still as ~25mL then how many moles of acetone are in the vapor phase inside the still? (PV=nRT) (R=0.0821 L*atm/mol*K) (Get conversion of P & T in right form.)

Answer:-

T= 70+273=343K
P=0.736/760=9.68x10-4atm
R=0.0821 L*atm/mol*K
V= 25x10-3L
n=no.of moles = PV/RT= 9.68x10-4atm x 25x10-3L /(0.0821 L*atm/mol*K x 343K)
= 8.59x10-7
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure
 
Is my work/answer correct?
 
Sure
 
lol, yes it is correct!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top