Determining particle spin in collision experiments

JustinLevy
Messages
882
Reaction score
1
How can high energy physicists determine the spin of a particle that decays before even reaching the silicon detectors?

For example if a new particle turned out to have spin 3/2, how would it be distinguished from a spin 1, spin 1/2, or spin 0 particle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually by the angular distribution of their decay products.
 
Angular distribution with respect to what?

And since the spin can't be known for each particle, wouldn't this require the production of the particle to be spin polarized?
 
Pick your favorite frame. The literature is full of them: Gottfried-Jackson (yes, that Jackson), Collins-Soper, Helicity.

It does not require polarization. It requires that the density matrix not be equally populated, which is similar but less restrictive.
 
There are number of ways of measuring spin, besides polarization.
The spin of the neutrino was 'measured' to be 1/2 because the other three particles in
neutron decay had spin 1/2.
Some spins are measure by recognizing the factor 1/(2s+1) in the cross section.
... and so on.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top