Determining the Coefficient of Kinetic Friction on an Incline

AI Thread Summary
The experiment aims to determine the coefficients of static and kinetic friction between a block and a wooden plank on an incline. The angle of incline has been established at 18°, with the coefficient of static friction calculated to be 0.32. The challenge lies in developing a procedure to measure the coefficient of kinetic friction without relying on mass. Suggestions include adjusting the incline to achieve a constant sliding speed, which could simplify the calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between acceleration and friction in this context.
Polus
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am conducting an experiment to determine the coefficient of static and kinetic friction between 2 objects I've arbitrarily chosen. I have a block and a plank of wood. I have been raising the plank to an incline to determine at what angle the block will begin sliding.

I was given no data, I'm measuring everything myself. I have determined that the angle of incline or θ = 18°. I then drew a FBD and determined the coefficient of static friction which I found to be 0.32.

The part I'm stuck on is question #3: "Now, using the same tools, figure out a procedure to determine the coefficient of kinetic friction. State your procedure."

I'm stuck because question #5 then asks: "Was it necessary to know the mass of the object to perform this activity? State how you can prove that mass is/is not necessary"

I've been trying to solve the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and plank of wood without mass first because I don't want to lose marks by arguing the incorrect conclusion.



2. The attempt at a solution
I attached the FBD, it's not the best image but I thought it'd be worth it to upload it. :P

I tried to come up with an equation which would let me solve for μ_k. The best I could come up with was: a_x = gsin(θ) - μ_k gcos(θ)

I assumed that F_{netx} = F_{gx} - F_k

I feel as if I'm on the right track (if it is even possible to find μ_k like this) as I have eliminated mass but I don't know what to do with the a_x.

Also, 18° was the angle I used for determining the coefficient of static friction. Am I wrong to use 18° for determining kinetic friction?


By the way, my tools are a protractor, ruler, my horizontal plane (the plank), and object used to slide (block). If I take question #3 literally I don't know how I would be able to determine the mass of my object. Although, I do roughly know the mass of my object. I was also thinking I could use Δd to determine acceleration but without a watch of some sort included in my list of tools I don't know if I am meant to use Δt in my equations.

This is my first post so I am sorry if it is formatted improperly (I tried my best!). Critiques to the formatting of my post would be much appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • FBD 001.jpg
    FBD 001.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 788
Physics news on Phys.org
Polus said:
I tried to come up with an equation which would let me solve for μ_k. The best I could come up with was: a_x = gsin(θ) - μ_k gcos(θ)

I assumed that F_{netx} = F_{gx} - F_k

I feel as if I'm on the right track (if it is even possible to find μ_k like this) as I have eliminated mass but I don't know what to do with the a_x.

Hello, Polus, and welcome to PF!

I think you have a very good start! Suppose you fiddle with the angle so that, after giving the block a little push to get it started, it slides with a slow constant speed down the slope. Would this help with what to do with ax? Of course, there will be some error in deciding whether or not the speed is constant. But if you play around with it, I think you can get a decent result.
 
Thanks, TSny. I consulted my teacher and she told me exactly what you did. :P
 
That's good. Have fun with the experiment!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top