Determining the energy radiated by gravitational waves in a simple system

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcatalang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the energy radiated by gravitational waves in a simplified two-mass system using Newtonian dynamics and general relativity principles. The integral transformation leads to an expression for the motion of the masses, allowing the derivation of a relationship between their velocities and positions. The gravitational wave power is linked to the third time derivative of the quadrupole tensor, which is calculated based on the system's mass distribution. The participants discuss how to express gravitational power as a function of separation and integrate it to find the total energy radiated. The conversation emphasizes the need for further calculations to fully resolve the integral and determine the gravitational power.
rcatalang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
We have two massive particles of mass ##m_1## and ##m_2## that approach each other from infinity up to a certain point, ##x_f##. One has to calculate the energy radiated through gravitational waves.
Relevant Equations
Equation of motion: ##\ddot{x}=\frac{-GM}{x^2}##.

Energy lost (disregarding constants): ##E\propto \int_{t=0}^{t_f} \frac{(\dot{x})^2}{x^4}##
I have tried simplifying the integral (turning into an integral in terms of position variables) using the equation of motion. It's easy to show:

$$\frac{1}{x^4}=\frac{(\ddot{x})^2}{(GM)^2} $$

And therefore one can write:

$$\frac{1}{(GM)^2}\int_{t=0}^{t_f} (\dot{x}\ddot{x})^2 dt = \frac{1}{(GM)^2}\int_{\infty}^{x_f} \dot{x}(\ddot{x})^2 dx $$

But I have no idea about how to continue further with this integral. Any ideas on how to solve this integral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me show you how to work this out. For brevity I'll just assume both masses are equal, ##m_1 = m_2 = m##, but you can easily re-scale the following results for the case of non-equal masses.

The idea is to assume that, since we're in linearized theory, the dynamics given by the Newtonian equations of motion are roughly correct. So consider the two masses to be at ##\pm x(t)## (and starting at ##\pm x_0##, which we'll later take to be infinity). The separation at time ##t## is just ##2x(t)##, and applying Newton III for either particle gives:$$m\ddot{x} = - \frac{Gm^2}{(2x)^2}$$You can multiply through by ##\dot{x}## and integrate both sides, which gets you something similar to an energy equation:$$ \frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{dt} (\dot{x}^2) = \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{Gm}{4x} \right)$$Using the initial conditions gives you:$$\dot{x}^2 = \frac{Gm}{2} \left( \frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x_0} \right)$$Now we return to general relativity briefly. The GW power is proportional to ##\dddot{Q}_{ij} \dddot{Q}_{ij}##, where ##Q_{ij}## is the trace-free part of the quadrupole tensor ##I_{ij}##, defined by:$$I_{ij} = \int \rho(\mathbf{x}) x_i x_j$$where ##\rho(\mathbf{x}) = m\delta(x(t)) + m\delta(-x(t))## in this case. You can see that this only has one non-zero component, ##I_{xx}##,$$I_{xx} = 2mx(t)^2$$So we'll need to find an expression for ##\dddot{I}_{ij}##. Churning out all three derivatives gives you:$$\dddot{I}_{xx} = 12m \dot{x} \ddot{x} + 4m x \ \dddot{x}$$That may look slightly unwieldy, but we do actually have everything we need. Recall that ##\ddot{x} = -GM/(4x^2)##, which you can differentiate again to get ##\dddot{x}##. If you plug everything in, you get\begin{align*}
\dddot{I}_{xx} = - \frac{GM \dot{x}}{x^2} = -\frac{GM}{x^2} \sqrt{\frac{GM}{2}} \sqrt{\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x_0}}
\end{align*}Since this is a homework problem, you have do some work as well. What is the trace free part ##\dddot{Q}_{ij} = \dddot{I}_{ij} - \frac{1}{3} \mathrm{Trace}(\dddot{I}) \delta_{ij}##? Note that ##\dddot{Q}_{ij}## also has ##yy## and ##zz## components. Therefore what is the gravitational power ##P(x)## as a function of ##x##?

Once you have the power ##P(x)##, you can easily integrate$$dE = P(x) dt = P(x) \frac{1}{\dot{x}} dx$$since we know ##\dot{x}## as a function of ##x##...
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top