Determining the Mass percent comp. of an Aqueous Hydrogen peroxide

AI Thread Summary
Assuming atmospheric pressure is 760 mm Hg instead of the recorded 768.2 torr would lead to a lower calculated mass percent of hydrogen peroxide in the solution. This is because the actual barometric pressure affects the vapor pressure and the amount of gas produced in the reaction. Using the ideal gas law (PV=nRT) for calculations, the discrepancy arises from the difference in pressure affecting the volume of gas and thus the concentration of the solution. The discussion highlights the importance of accurate pressure measurements in determining solution concentrations. Accurate barometric pressure is essential for precise calculations in chemistry.
Marie123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In lab we recorded a barometric pressure of 768.2 torr. Suppose we didn't have access to a barometer and assumed that atmospheric pressure was 760 mm Hg. Would the mass percent of hydrogen peroxide that you calculated for the solution be higher or lower than the value you obtained using the actual barometric pressure.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think it would be lower (I did it through calculations) but was wondering why it would be the lower or simply the science behind why it would be lower. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a formula that you used for calculating the hydrogen peroxide from the barometric pressure?
 
i just used pv=nrt
2H2O2 (aq) -> 2H2O (l) + O2 (g)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top