Determining the number of subsets of a set with a specific property

jdinatale
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
I found an example like the problem asks, but I'm still trying to show the first part. You want the maximum number of subsets such that you can guarantee none are pairwise disjoint.

I'm trying to apply my specific case to the whole problem. For a set with 3 elements, I chose all of the sets with 2 elements, \binom{3}{2} and all of the sets with 3 elements, \binom{3}{3}, which is 4 sets.

In general, for an set with n elements, would I want to choose all sets of with n - 1 elements, which would be \binom{n}{n - 1} = n of them and the set with n elements which there is \binom{3}{3} = 1 of them.

But that's only n + 1 sets, when I want 2^{n - 1} sets.

I know that \binom{n}{0} + \binom{n}{1} + \binom{n}{2} + ... + \binom{n}{n} = 2^n, which is really close to what I want to show.

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y89/jdinatale/Joseph-5.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For an example where equality holds for general n, consider this: how many subsets of {1,2,...,n} contain 1?

To prove the inequality, consider this: if the collection contains a set A, can it also contain the complement of A?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top