Determining the rate law from experimental data

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the rate law from experimental data using the initial rates method. The user encounters multiple solutions for the reaction order of reactant B, specifically -2.5 and -0.5, and seeks guidance on identifying the correct one. It is clarified that using different rate comparisons should yield consistent results, as the concentration of reactants cancels out. The key takeaway is that the same ratio should provide the same answer regardless of the rates compared. Understanding the correct application of the method is crucial for accurate determination of the rate law.
fridakahlo
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


First question on PDF:
http://ars-chemia.net/Classes/102/Problem_Sets/Practice Exam for Exam 1 Key.pdf

Homework Equations


I used the initial rates method:
Rate2/Rate1=k2*[A]^m/k1*[A]^m

The Attempt at a Solution


When I solve these types of problems with the initial rates method, I get multiple possible solutions. For instance, for reactant B, I got -2.5 when comparing rates 3 and 2, but when comparing rates 3 and 1 I got -0.5. I know the answer is -0.5.
My question is how do I know which one is the most plausible answer when solving these types of problems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It was rather hard for me to make out what your question is. I guess it is about Question 1? This appears to be solved correctly, I presume the answers in red are yours? What is written above though does not correspond to this answer.
 
Last edited:
fridakahlo said:

Homework Statement


First question on PDF:
http://ars-chemia.net/Classes/102/Problem_Sets/Practice Exam for Exam 1 Key.pdf

Homework Equations


I used the initial rates method:
Rate2/Rate1=k2*[A]^m/k1*[A]^m

The Attempt at a Solution


When I solve these types of problems with the initial rates method, I get multiple possible solutions. For instance, for reactant B, I got -2.5 when comparing rates 3 and 2, but when comparing rates 3 and 1 I got -0.5. I know the answer is -0.5.
My question is how do I know which one is the most plausible answer when solving these types of problems?
you take any ratio ...answer should be same
If you take R1/R3 then [A] is canceled and if you do R3 and R1 then plug in the conc of A with raise to power of its order .. it should give us the same answer ...
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top