Determining when a function is an element of L^2 (0,1)

[lants]

Homework Statement

Determine for what k f(x)=x^k is an element of L² (0,1) vector space
k ∈ ℝ

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

\int_{0}^{1} x^{2k} dx = \frac{1-0^{2k+1}}{1+2k} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{(-2k)^{n}} (for k > -½)

This sum should converge for <br /> \lim_{n \to +\infty}<br /> {\frac{|(-2k)^{n+1}|}{|(-2k)^{n}|}} &lt; 1<br /> =<br /> |-2k| &lt; 1<br />

Which gives me a radius of convergence for
- \frac{1}{2} &lt; k &lt; \frac{1}{2}<br />

But just by examining it, the integral should exist for any k greater than negative one-half, what is wrong with my ratio test?

 

[LCKurtz]

Homework Statement

Determine for what k f(x)=x^k is an element of L² (0,1) vector space
k ∈ ℝ

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

\int_{0}^{1} x^{2k} dx = \frac{1-0^{2k+1}}{1+2k} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{(-2k)^{n}} (for v > -½)

This sum should converge for <br /> \lim_{n \to +\infty}<br /> {\frac{|(-2k)^{n+1}|}{|(-2k)^{n}|}} &lt; 1<br /> =<br /> |-2k| &lt; 1<br />

Which gives me a radius of convergence for
- \frac{1}{2} &lt; k &lt; \frac{1}{2}<br />

But just by examining it, the integral should exist for any k greater than negative one-half, what is wrong with my ratio test?

The infinite series doesn't represent the fraction for all values of k. The series may not converge for some k but that doesn't mean the fraction's value doesn't exist.

 

[lants]

Ok thanks, obvious mistake

 

[HallsofIvy]

I don't see your logic. The integral of x^{2k} is the number 1/(2k+ 1) as long as that number exists. What does that have to do with whether or not there is a geometric sequence converging to it? If k= 1, which is greater than 1/2, f(x)= x which is certainly twice integrable between 0 and 1.

 

[lants]

someone already responded pointing out it was wrong in an actually helpful way, and I already responded back, so move along now