I broke down and bought Edwin F. Taylor’s Space time Physics(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am having trouble understanding the detonator paradox.

The book states that there will be an explosion but it doesn’t explain why.

Am I suppose to say the story violates one of these principles.

Special relativity problems intended to be paradoxes usually involve some careful thinking. First of all, for special relativity to apply, the two postulates proposed by Einstein have to be true:

1) The bodies involved must have uniform velocity. No acceleration is permitted.

2) The speed of light is the same for all observers in all frames.

Or is this explanation correct I found it on the web.

Fom Edwin F. Taylor's Spacetime Physics, P.185, problem 6-5. A U-shaped structure contains a detonator switch connected by wire to one ton of the TNT. A T-shaped structure fits inside the U, with the arm of the T not quite long enough to reach the detonator switch when both structures are at rest. Now the T is removed to the left and accelerated to high speed. It is Lorentz- contracted along its direction of motion. As a result, its long arm is not long enough to reach the detonator switch when the two collide. However, look at the same situation in the rest frame of the T structure. In this frame the arm of T has its rest length, while the two arms of the U structure are Lorentz-contracted. Therefore the arm of the T will certainly strike the detonator switch. The question is whether there will be an explosion. Figure: | =======+ |====== S|~~~~TNT (S denotes the switch) | =======+ <--x-> <--y--> The answer is there will be an explosion. Someone said that due to there is no absolutely rigid body so the arm of T will continue its motion for some time even the cap of T strike the arms of U. But can we prove the two frames agree quantitatively? In the rest frame of T, the sufficient condition for the explosion is x>=y*Sqrt [1-v^2], but in the rest frame of U, the condition depends on when the arm stop and I can't make it agree with the condition in the rest frame of T exactly. How do you resolve it?. How do you resolve it?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Detonator paradox

Loading...

Similar Threads - Detonator paradox | Date |
---|---|

B Lag of a clock coming back to its initial position (Twins Paradox) | Mar 7, 2018 |

I Scientific American on the Twin Paradox | Feb 21, 2018 |

B Twin paradox and the body | Feb 20, 2018 |

B Hockey Puck Paradox | Jan 11, 2018 |

Detonator paradox | Mar 30, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**