Subject: Re: Einstein & "ether" misunderstood.
From:
mmessall@mindspring.com
Date: 29 Nov 1998 00:00:00 GMT
Approved:
baez@math.ucr.edu
Newsgroups: sci.physics.research,sci.physics
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
References: <3658BEEE.2C8B701D@well.com> <mmcirvin-2411982021080001@ppp0a007.std.com> <73jlhi$vbd$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Reply-To:
mmessall@mindspring.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ca314159@bestweb.net wrote:
> In article <mmcirvin-2411982021080001@ppp0a007.std.com>,
>
mmcirvin@world.std.com (Matt McIrvin) wrote:
> > In article <3658BEEE.2C8B701D@well.com>, Jack <sarfatti@well.com> wrote:
> > >A common failure of physics teachers in high school and up,
> > >including many textbooks, is that they say that Einstein
> > >rejected the idea of the "ether".
This is not at all true.
> > >What Einstein actually rejected was not "ethers" (there are
> > >more than one) but "absolute ethers". This is made crystal
> > >clear in his 1924 essay "On The Ether". Einstein basically
> > >embraced a more general form of Newton's third law that Paul
> > >Hewitt has expressed as "You cannot touch without being
> > >touched."