Did I Calculate the Tension in the Cord Correctly?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in a cord connecting two boxes on different surfaces. The first participant derived the tension as T = 16.0 N but was informed that this value is incorrect due to not accounting for the vertical component of the weight of the box on the incline. The correct approach involves considering the weight parallel to the incline, which is affected by the angle of the incline. A hint was provided to think about the scenario if the inclined plane were absent, emphasizing the need to adjust calculations based on the incline's support. Understanding the relationship between the incline angle and the forces involved is crucial for accurate tension calculation.
apiwowar
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Figure 5-56 shows a box of mass m2 = 1.3 kg on a frictionless plane inclined at angle θ = 34°. It is connected by a cord of negligible mass to a box of mass m1 = 2.7 kg on a horizontal frictionless surface. The pulley is frictionless and massless. (a) If the magnitude of the horizontal force F is 2.5 N, what is the tension in the connecting cord? (b) What is the largest value the magnitude of F may have without the connecting cord becoming slack?


so i broke this up into 2 free body diagrams

for the first one i got T+2.5 = 2.7a so T = 2.7a-2.5

for the second one T-7.1 = 1.3a so T=1.3a+7.1

putting them together and solving for a i got a = 6.86m/s^2

when i plugged that back to solve to T i got T = 16.0N

but its ssaying that 16.0 is wrong, did i do anything wrong?

and can i get a hint for part b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot to take into account the fact that it's only the vertical component of the weight that's going to affect the tension.
 
what do you mean?
 
Well, imagine if that 34 degree incline was non existent, and the m2 was instead hanging in the air, with no surface supporting it. Don't you think that would change the tension in the cable?

That value of 16.0N that you calculated would be correct if in such a scenario because you haven't taken into account that there is some support being provided to m2.
 
Last edited:
if there was no surface then the force downward would just be the weight, but since there is a surface you find the weight that is parallel to that surface which is mgsin(x). is that what youre getting at?
 
Yeah, whether it's sin or cos I'm not sure, but since you have the final answer already you can figure that one out.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top