Did I do this angular acceleration problem right?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angular acceleration of blender blades that slow from 7000 rpm to rest in 3.4 seconds. The correct approach involves converting rpm to radians per second, resulting in an initial angular velocity of approximately 2638937.829 rad/s. The formula for angular acceleration is applied, yielding a deceleration of -776158.185 rad/s². Participants emphasize the importance of accurate unit conversions and calculations in solving the problem. The conversation highlights common pitfalls in physics calculations, particularly regarding unit conversions.
zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
The blades in a blender rotate at a rate of 7000 rpm. When the motor is turned off during operation, the blades slow to rest in 3.4 s.
What is the angular acceleration as the blades slow down?



Lets first convert rpm to rps and then multiply by 2π to get its angular velocity.

7000rpm * 60 = 420000 rps * 2π = 2638937.829 rad/s

Now just simply use.

Wf = Wi + AT
A = Wf - Wi / T
A = (0) - (2638937.829) / (3.4)
A = -776158.185 rad/s^2 <-----Answer

The answer is negative because its decelerating.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zeromodz said:
7000rpm * 60 = 420000 rps * 2π = 2638937.829 rad/s

Are you sure about that?
 
bp_psy said:
Are you sure about that?

Yes you have to convert it into rps to get seconds and then multiply times 2 pie to get radians per second.
 
zeromodz said:
Yes you have to convert it into rps to get seconds and then multiply times 2 pie to get radians per second.

1min= 60s not the other way around
 
zeromodz said:
Yes you have to convert it into rps to get seconds and then multiply times 2 pie to get radians per second.

Calculate again. Your answer is wrong. rev convert to radian, minute convert to second.
Unit conversion is very important. Becareful / * sign .
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top