Did viruses exist before there were bacteria?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpaceGuy50
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bacteria
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the evolutionary relationship between viruses and bacteria, with a consensus that viruses likely evolved after bacteria. It is noted that viruses require the cellular machinery of other organisms, particularly bacteria, to replicate, which implies that bacteria must have existed before viruses. Some participants suggest that viruses may have originated from parasitic bacteria or from fragments of nucleic acids that escaped bacterial cells. The conversation also touches on the idea that early viruses could have been self-replicating genes, akin to transposons, which insert themselves into the genetic material of host cells. The role of viruses in the evolution of life, including potential contributions to genetic diversity and sexual reproduction, is acknowledged. Overall, the dialogue highlights the complex interplay between viruses and their hosts in the context of early life on Earth.
SpaceGuy50
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Did viruses exist before bacteria ever existed on Earth?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
No, viruses (virii?) need bacteria to live.
They probably evolved from parasite bacteria or even from bits of raw nucleic acid that got out of bacteria cells.
 
mgb_phys said:
No, viruses (virii?) need bacteria to live.
They probably evolved from parasite bacteria or even from bits of raw nucleic acid that got out of bacteria cells.

That's a new one on me. They simply need some other living organisms to proliferate, don't they?

Your point seems reasonable though. I've taken it as nearly axiomatic.
 
Phrak said:
That's a new one on me. They simply need some other living organisms to proliferate, don't they?
They need cells and the only cells around at the time were bacteria. Virus now infect just about everything.
 
mgb_phys said:
They need cells and the only cells around at the time were bacteria. Virus now infect just about everything.

OK. Got it.

Consider some RNA split-off from a parent bacteria--our progenator viral cell. The mechanisms by which it proliferates is contained in the species of organism from which it split. It becomes a predator, or parasite upon the relatives from which it sprang.
 
Phrak said:
It becomes a predator, or parasite upon the relatives from which it sprang.
They do have some good points, they swapped a lot of genes with early cells and may even have contributed to inventing sexual reproduction.
 
mgb_phys said:
They do have some good points, they swapped a lot of genes with early cells and may even have contributed to inventing sexual reproduction.

Now that's interesting. It seems you're ahead of me.

I was considering what the equivalent protogenic software would be like on a computer. Most likely it would be a corruption (mutation) of some elements of the supervisory program. The difference, as it stands today, is that most supervisory corruptions don't have the opportunity to proliferate to supervisories elsewhere.
 
mgb_phys said:
No, viruses (virii?)

Viruses. There is no plural for the Latin virus[/url]. Since it is now an English word with a different meaning and usage, the English rules for pluralization apply.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/virus#Latin
 
the rna world hypothesis suggests that rna molecules were able to survive and reproduce before bacteria existed.
 
  • #10
Do I have this right? Do all viruses require the DNA or RNA of another organism to synthesize molecular elements to construct their own structure?
 
  • #11
Phrak said:
Do I have this right? Do all viruses require the DNA or RNA of another organism to synthesize molecular elements to construct their own structure?

Viruses require the molecular machinery and building blocks of another organism to replicate (i.e. enzymes, nucleotides, amino acids). They provide their own DNA or RNA. To address the original question, almost by definition "bacteria" would have to have existed before any phage (a bacterial virus) because of a phage's inability to independently self-replicate. However, it seems logical to me that the earliest true viruses probably showed up very early on, taking the form of self-replicating genes that could insert themselves into the nucleic acid polymers of early protocells. Today, these self-replicating genes are known as transposons and are found in all forms of life. In my opinion, bacteriophages, viruses, and plasmids probably evolved from these early "genetic parasites".
 
  • #12
jamesv87 said:
Viruses require the molecular machinery and building blocks of another organism to replicate (i.e. enzymes, nucleotides, amino acids). They provide their own DNA or RNA. To address the original question, almost by definition "bacteria" would have to have existed before any phage (a bacterial virus) because of a phage's inability to independently self-replicate. However, it seems logical to me that the earliest true viruses probably showed up very early on, taking the form of self-replicating genes that could insert themselves into the nucleic acid polymers of early protocells. Today, these self-replicating genes are known as transposons and are found in all forms of life. In my opinion, bacteriophages, viruses, and plasmids probably evolved from these early "genetic parasites".

Thanks james. That's what I'd gathered, but wasn't sure. This close association would almost demand that viruses were the 'unexpected' prodigy of what would become their first hosts, wouldn't it?
 
  • #13
Obviously, abiogenesis is still unclear.

Here's an interesting article by Zimmer from Science a few years back about how viruses may have helped shape life: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/sci;312/5775/870
 
Back
Top