Diels-Alder Reaction: Predict Product | 65 Characters

  • Thread starter Thread starter thE3nigma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around predicting the product of a Diels-Alder reaction involving a diene and methyl 2-butenoate. Participants clarify that the methyl ester and hydrogen can be oriented either out of or into the plane of the paper without being incorrect, as the endo rule does not apply in this case. Methyl 2-butenoate is confirmed as a dienophile, and its double bond configuration is identified as Z. The diene in question is not cyclic, and both substituents should ideally be oriented in a syn fashion. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding molecular orientation in Diels-Alder reactions.
thE3nigma
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is not a homework question but something I found within my textbook. I just wanted to understand a solution they gave to the problem.

The question is:
Predict the product of the following Diels-Alder reaction:

The structures of two molecules, a diene (4 carbons long) and a methyl butyrate (methyl butanoate).

The answer has the methyl ester and H atom popping out of the book. I just wanted to confirm that it would not be wrong if it was drawn with the methyl ester and H atom going into the book would it? I do not think this is an endo substituent in this case.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is methyl butyrate a dienophile? Not in my books.
 
Sorry, I misspelled the molecules name. It is methyl 2-butenoate (I believe that is the correct name). There is a double bond between the second and third carbon after the COO- group.
 
... and is the diene cyclic? Is that methyl-2-butenoate E or Z?
 
It is Z, the diene is not cyclic.
 
Endo isn't the right term to use in this system. http://www.iupac.org/goldbook/E02094.pdf"

Both the methyl ester and the methyl group should be either up or down... syn fashion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top