Difference between heat, thermal energy, and temperature

AI Thread Summary
Heat is the transfer of energy between substances due to temperature differences, while thermal energy represents the total kinetic and potential energy within a substance. Temperature measures the average kinetic energy per particle in a substance. A lower temperature substance, like ice, can possess more thermal energy than a higher temperature substance, such as a heated nail. Thermal energy primarily relates to kinetic energy, but potential energy becomes relevant during phase changes, like melting ice into water. The relationship between thermal energy and potential energy can vary based on context, as internal energy and enthalpy depend on both forms of energy.
Snazzy
Messages
470
Reaction score
0
This isn't really a homework question per se. I'm studying for my MCAT and I'm having trouble trying to firmly get down some of the concepts in thermodynamics.

As far as I know, heat is the means of energy transfer that isn't work from one substance to another due to a difference in temperature between the two substances.

Thermal energy is the total amount of kinetic and potential energy in a substance.

Temperature is the average (per particle) amount of kinetic and potential energy in a substance.

So something that has a lower temperature, like a big chunk of ice, may have more thermal energy than something like a small heated nail.

Am I on the right track? I'm not too sure whether temperature/thermal energy is a measure of potential energy and kinetic energy, or just one or the other.

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thermal energy and temperature refer to kinetic energy, and not potential energy. For example, it when you add heat to ice at 0oC, the heat does not change the thermal energy or temperature of the ice. Instead the heat changes the ice into water, increasing the potential energy of the water molecules.
 
Is not thermal energy also related to the potential energy of the molecules?
 
It depends what you mean by thermal energy (I'm not so sure this is a well defined term). Certainly the internal energy and enthalpy of molecules are dependent on both the kinetic and potential energy of the molecules.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top