Difference between 'Optical Spectral Type' and 'IR Spectral Type'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter omoplata
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Type
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the distinction between 'Optical Spectral Type' and 'IR Spectral Type' in L and T dwarfs, noting that these classifications arise from different measurement instruments. It emphasizes that spectral types reflect surface temperatures, yet optical and infrared measurements can yield varying results due to the faintness of visual spectra. The infrared spectral type is suggested to be more accurate, as most celestial objects, particularly those with low V-band emissions, are brighter in the infrared spectrum. The optical band, limited to the V-band spectrum, provides a narrower view compared to the broader infrared spectrum. Overall, the choice of spectral type depends on the specific characteristics of the observed objects.
omoplata
Messages
327
Reaction score
2
In the list of L and T dwarfs at 'dwarfarchives.org' (http://ldwarf.ipac.caltech.edu/archive/version5/viewlist.php?table=ltdwarf&format=html") there are two columns named 'spectral_type_opt' and 'spectral_type_ir'. I guess this comes from the type of instrument used in the measurements?

If I'm correct, the Spectral Type indicates the surface temperature of stars. If so why would the optical and infrared spectra give two different measurements? Which one is more accurate? Since the visual spectra of L and T dwarfs are very faint, would the 'infrared spectral type' be more accurate?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The optical band, usually referred to as the V-band spectrum, is a small slice of the EM spectrum. The IR spectrum is much wider. Most objects in the universe are brighter in the IR spectrum - especially those with low V-band emissions.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top