Difference between orbital mechanics and astrodynamics ?

AI Thread Summary
Orbital mechanics and astrodynamics are often used interchangeably, but some distinctions exist. Astrodynamics typically focuses on the motion of spacecraft, while orbital mechanics is more associated with celestial bodies. Sources like Wikipedia suggest there is no fundamental difference, but references such as Vallado's "Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications" clarify that astrodynamics pertains specifically to man-made objects in space. The confusion arises from the varying contexts in which these terms are applied. Overall, while both fields study motion in space, their applications and focus areas can differ significantly.
thor36
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello all.
The title of this thread sums up my question - what is the difference between orbital mechanics and astrodynamics ? Or is there a difference at all ?

I have sometimes seen different uses of the terms, for example, on many sites I see " astrodynamics or orbital mechanics is ... " , while on others I see " astrodynamics studies motion of spacecraft ... ". Often terms are used interchangeably, but sometimes some distinctions are made. For example as mentioned, astrodynamics is sometimes mentioned along with spacecraft , while orbital mechanics is with celestial bodies.

Does anyone know how things stand and possibly support it with references ?
Thank you and kind regards, T
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That's right, and Wikipedia is not the only source that says there is no difference. But to quote Vallado ( Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications ), which quotes "Space Vehicle Design" :

"Astrodynamics is the study of the motion of man-made objects in space, subject to both natural and artificially induced forces."

And astrodynamics really is most cases used only in context of spacecraft . That's why I find it confusing.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top