Difference Between Spatial and Temporal Frequency Decomposition of Waves?

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

In Griffiths it is stated that any possible wave can be written as a sum of plane waves

<br /> f(z,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{A(k)e^{i(kz-\omega t)}dk}<br />

This is a sum over spatial frequencies. In another book I have, they write the H-field as

<br /> H(r, t) = \sum_n{C_n H_n(r)\exp (-i\omega_n(t-t_0)}<br />

where Cn are the amplitudes. This is a sum over temporal frequencies (i.e. ω, not k) of monochromatic waves. What is the difference between expressing an arbitrary wave in terms of frequency and spatial components? Is the answer that there is no difference, since (because of dispersion), when I vary k I also automatically vary ω and vice versa?Niles.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Homework Equationsf(z,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{A(k)e^{i(kz-\omega t)}dk}H(r, t) = \sum_n{C_n H_n(r)\exp (-i\omega_n(t-t_0)}The Attempt at a SolutionNo attempt at a solution has been made.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top