Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Difference between Wieghtless and Freefall?

  1. Aug 19, 2003 #1
    It is say when an astronaut is in a spaceshuttle orbiting the Earth, he feels "weightless".

    My physics teacher says that is not true, he said that it is mere the sensation of the astronaut not physical reality.

    But from my knowledge, the weighless felt by the astronaut is because of he is constantly frefalling towards earth. And according to relativity, a freefalling frame of reference is equivalent to an inertial frame of reference. So, doesn't that means that the sensation felt by the astronaut is the same as physical reality?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 19, 2003 #2
    Well you say the astronaut "feels" weightless, then your physics teacher says it's his "sensation." Are they not the same thing?

    I think all your teacher was saying is that the astronaut is not actually weightless, in that there is a substantial gravitational force acting between the astronaut and the earth, he just merely feels weightless because of his acceleration. At least that's what I read into his comment.
     
  4. Aug 19, 2003 #3

    jcsd

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Yep, that's what he means. Weight is the force dragging you towards the centre of the Earth (= mg), this force is still acting on the astronaut even though he's in orbit and therefore freefall.
     
  5. Aug 19, 2003 #4

    Integral

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    But the astronaught is weightless! Weight measured is in lbs or Newtons and is only felt on the surface of the earth where there is a reaction force (the earth pushing up on your feet). The astronaught is not massless but he is weightless.
     
  6. Aug 19, 2003 #5

    jcsd

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The force's still acting on you, therefore you have 'weight'.
     
  7. Aug 19, 2003 #6
    In deep space he'd be "weightless". It's different in orbit. That's just freefall. Like falling out of a plane.
     
  8. Aug 19, 2003 #7

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Tomato...
     
  9. Aug 19, 2003 #8

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    What we feel as weight is not the downward force -gm (where m is our mass) but rather the upward force +gm which we have to exert to resist the downward one. This tenses our muscles and we feel it when we do squats or push ups.

    In free fall the force -gm is still there, but it is unresisted (that is what is meant by 'free'), so the astronaut is falling. Being in orbit means to fall. So "the force is with him", but what he is accustomed to call his weight is not.
     
  10. Aug 19, 2003 #9

    jcsd

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The standard defintion of weight is the force of graviational attraction not the reaction force.
     
  11. Aug 19, 2003 #10

    Integral

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    What we measure, and call weight is the reaction force. What we feel and call weight is the reaction force. So for all practical purposes the reaction force IS the weight.
     
  12. Aug 19, 2003 #11

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Hey, so what are you measuring if you flip over your bathroom scale?

    Katsup....

    Ketchup.

    This is a really pointless thread.
     
  13. Aug 20, 2003 #12
    All matter has gravity. We attract the earth just as the earth attracts us. The astronauts are attracted to the spacecraft and vice-versa. This force is not as strong and may not even be measureable, but is there none-the-less wherever they are.
     
  14. Aug 20, 2003 #13
    Fo real? :)
     
  15. Aug 20, 2003 #14
    I know, but they all seem to have neglected that in the previous responses, so I thought I would throw it in.
     
  16. Aug 20, 2003 #15
    What the astronaut no longer feels is the reaction (sensation) of (his/her) "inertial mass" to the gravitational field of the Earth as the Earth's field effect has been subsumed by the ongoing free fall event.

    That help?
     
  17. Aug 21, 2003 #16
    In my previous post I said that the astronaut freefalling alone with the spaceshuttle, in this scenario, and I'm fairly convinced that he is not be free of forces because of the mutual gravitational atraction between him and the space shuttle.

    But would the astronaut (or anyone) be truely free of all external forces if only he or she is present freefalling with respect to Earth and with no other matter in the system?

    I read a book that says if you fall through an imaginary tunnel right through the center of a earth, during that time, you would be in an inertial reference frame.

    If what I recalled above is true, then surely the anyone who is frefalling with no other matter freefalling in the system, it would be correct to say he or she is "physically" weightless.
     
  18. Aug 21, 2003 #17

    LURCH

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    But this reproduces the situation of a person inside a shuttle. Inside the tunnel, there is something exerting gravitational influence on the person, but from all directions around him. In the shuttle, the vehical pulls on the astronaut, but from all around him (although I suppose the pull is greater from below and near the tail).

    But I'm fairly certain that none of this is what the physics etacher in the original post was reffering to. He seems to mean that an individual in freefall is not weightless because if they were, they wouldn;t be "falling". With this I must respectfully dissagree. If an object is following it's own worldline without acceleration forces, it is weightless.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Difference between Wieghtless and Freefall?
Loading...