Difference btw induced and static electric field.

AI Thread Summary
Induced electric fields differ from static electric fields in that the curl of the electric field (∇x E) is non-zero for induced fields, while it is zero for static fields. This distinction raises questions about why both are referred to as electric fields despite their differing properties. Both types of electric fields exert forces on charges according to the equation F_e = q E. In the context of relativity, the distinction becomes less significant, as the Lorentz transformation combines both fields into a total electric field within the electromagnetic field tensor. Ultimately, the convenience of treating them as a sum simplifies analysis, even though their origins and characteristics differ.
lavesh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
∇x E≠0 for an induced electric field whereas for field produced by static charges we have ∇x E=0.
This is a very huge difference in the property of a vector field,then why do we call both of them electric field ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They both exert forces on charges according to ##{\vec F}_e = q \vec E##.

Also, in relativity we don't distinguish between the two kinds of electric field when transforming from one reference frame to another via the Lorentz transformation. In the electromagnetic field tensor, it's always the sum of the two (i.e. the total electric field) that appears.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor
 
you could call them different things, but they exert forces the same way so it's convenient to just add them up.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top