Differences between solenoidal and rotational vector fields?

AI Thread Summary
Solenoidal vector fields are defined as divergence-free, while rotational vector fields are associated with non-conservative fields that are not gradients of scalar fields. The terms "solenoidal" and "rotational" are not synonymous; solenoidal fields are irrotational, meaning they can be expressed as the gradient of a scalar field. The confusion arises because both terms describe different properties of vector fields, with solenoidal indicating a lack of divergence and rotational indicating a lack of curl. Ultimately, the zero vector field exemplifies both characteristics, being both solenoidal and irrotational.
sawer
Messages
65
Reaction score
2
In my electromagnetic theory book, there is a classification of vector fields, one of the 4 different type vector fields is "solenoidal and irrotational vector field" (both divergence-free and curl-free).

If solenoidal and rotational vector fields are same thing, then it means the vector field is "rotational and irrotational vector field" at the same time. But we just want to indicate it is divergence and curl free.

Is it the reason why synonym names(solenoidal and rotational) are used, to avoid confusion, or do they have different meanings?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solenoidal means divergence-free. Irrotational means the same as Conservative, which means the vector field is the gradient of a scalar field. The term 'Rotational Vector Field is hardly ever used. But if one wished to use it, it would simply mean a vector field that is non-conservative, ie not the gradient of any scalar field.
Solenoidal and Rotational are not the same. The zero vector field is both Solenoidal and Irrotational.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top