Differences in grounding and returning a circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gresham Conway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Grounding
AI Thread Summary
In vehicle electrical systems, the metal frame often serves as a return path for current, allowing for fewer wires. The negative terminal of the battery is typically connected to the frame, which helps complete the circuit without needing a separate return wire. While the frame can effectively ground the circuit, it is not directly connected to Earth, as vehicles are insulated by their tires. Corrosion in the frame can create resistance, affecting high-current devices like starter motors, which usually have dedicated return paths. Understanding these connections clarifies how circuits function in vehicles without traditional grounding.
Gresham Conway
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So I just got finished with my second physics course (electricity and magnetism) and from what I learned about circuits, to complete a circuit there must be a potential difference to create a current. I just wired up some new off road lights on my vehicle, and when wiring, I ran a wire from the positive terminal of my battery to each light, but had a ground wire on each that I just bolted up to the frame (no return wire to the battery). Can someone explain to me how this works? Do the electrons flow through the battery, through the lights to the frame, and eventually to Earth where the potential is 0, thus creating a potential difference? Why don't I have to run a return wire? What exactly is the difference between a ground and a negative terminal on a battery?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In circuits where there is a ground symbol, that point is considered to be at reference 0 potential. It need not be actual "ground" or "earth". As per my understanding, negative terminal of the battery should also be connected to the metal frame in order to draw current. Metal frame reduces wiring for return path of the current. Whatever you described, if it is working without the -ve terminal of the battery, then I'm afraid I haven't understood the situation and something else is happening here.
 
Gresham Conway said:
Do the electrons flow through the battery, through the lights to the frame, and eventually to Earth where the potential is 0, thus creating a potential difference?
In vehicles, the frame is generally used for the return current path for convenience and to lower the amount of wiring. The vehicle is "floating" on insulating tires, so there is no Earth ground involved in the circuit.

BTW, remember that the direction of the flow of electrons is opposite of the direction of what we refer to as the "current". :smile:
 
An Earth ground is added or required when there is a possibility of a short circuit that may energize some part of the device that can expose the operator to a dangerously high voltage. In such a situation the current is shunted directly to ground through a low resistance path as opposed to through the operator.
 
cnh1995 said:
Metal frame reduces wiring for return path of the current.
When a vehicle gets old, there can be corrosion in the metal seams. This can produce resistance in the Earth return path. Devices that take heavy current will suffer because of the consequent voltage drops. In particular, the starter motor nearly always has its own return path, via the engine block and a heavy cable, directly to the battery negative terminal. When the starter takes hundreds of Amps (say 500A), even a comparatively low path resistance (0.01Ω) can reduce the volts delivered by 5V. Earth return is not always appropriate.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995 and berkeman
Thanks guys, that definitely makes sense. I actually talked to my dad, who is an electrician, after I posted this, and he told me that the negative terminal was actually connected to the frame. I didn't know that, so I was confused as to how the circuit was completed. It seemed pretty unlikely to me that pretty much any bolt on the car was part of the circuit, but I guess everything is connected in one way or another.
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top