Differences in tagging Gram-negative and positive bacteria?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skwrl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bacteria Positive
AI Thread Summary
Tagging bacteria with fluorescent proteins like GFP and mCherry is generally applicable to both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, with the main difference lying in the plasmids and promoters used. While the fluorescent protein itself does not significantly differ between the two types, plasmid compatibility and the activity of specific promoters are crucial factors in successful tagging. Not all promoters will function equally across different bacterial types, which can affect the efficiency of the tagging process. The discussion references a specific article that provides further insights into these considerations.
Skwrl
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

Recently I've been reading about tagging bacteria with GFP, mCherry and other fluorescent proteins. The article I'm reading now (Lagendijk et at., 2010, Genetic tools for tagging Gram negative bacteria with mCherry...) has information on tagging Gram-negative bacteria, but it doesn't say anything about Gram-positive ones. Is the principle similar or is tagging with marker genes different when the bacteria are Gram-positive?

Thank you in advance!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
As far as the fluorescent protein, it should not matter. Look at this article for example:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19264102

However, plasmids and promoter will matter. It has to do with plasmid compatibility and not every promoter will recognized or have the same activity.
 
iansmith said:
As far as the fluorescent protein, it should not matter. Look at this article for example:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19264102

However, plasmids and promoter will matter. It has to do with plasmid compatibility and not every promoter will recognized or have the same activity.
Hey Ian! Good to see you back!
 
Thanks for the help!
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Back
Top