DIfferent Amounts of Oxygen in Combustion?

AI Thread Summary
Combustion reactions vary significantly based on the availability of oxygen, categorized into three types: very short supply, limited supply, and abundant supply. In a very short supply of oxygen, incomplete combustion occurs, leading to the production of carbon monoxide (CO) instead of carbon dioxide (CO2), which poses safety concerns. The discussion highlights the ambiguity in defining "short" and "limited" oxygen supplies, suggesting they refer to conditions where oxygen is below the stoichiometric requirements for complete combustion. The combustion process may involve adding butane or oxygen incrementally or mixing both before ignition, though the specifics are not clearly defined in the course material. The complexity of non-stoichiometric combustion is noted, emphasizing the need for careful interpretation of educational resources and the potential for varied outcomes based on oxygen availability.
JDK
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I know I should have knowledge of this, but I can't seem to remember very well what happens in combustion reactions with a very short supply, limited supply, and abundant supply of oxygen. What is the difference? I know complete combustion hands down, but what happens in a problem such as this...

(Write a balanced equation to represent the following)
a) Combustion of butane in a very short supply of oxygen


[?] Thanks so much! I don't need answers really, just an explanation of the three categorizations and their significance while writing the equations.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
How "short" is a "very short supply?" How is the combustion process conducted? add butane incrementally to the limited oxygen? oxygen incrementally to the butane? mix and ignite?
 
That it does not specify. Sorry. I'm in Chem 20 and currently completing the Unit on Organic Halides and Hydrocarbon Reactions. What I posted is what the question completely is. I'm thinking, since I'm just beginning to learn organic chemistry, that the most simple assumption would be the correct one for the Q.
 
My inferrence from "short" and "limited" is that less than the stoichiometric minimum for complete combustion is available --- that said, there ain't no balanced equations for such combustions without a LOT of additional data.

The "simplest" assumption I can make is that the text for the course is less than carefully written. From that point, all I can suggest to you is that somewhere in the text are comments loosely defining "short, limited, and abundant" in the author's mind, and that the author's assertions regarding the topic are what you are to "regurgitate" as an indication that you have read the material, be it correct, or not.

You have my sympathies, and I'll wish you luck on this, and if you're going to continue in chemistry, be certain to understand that some sources are more useful than others.
 
http://succ.shirazu.ac.ir/~motor/page9t.htm may be of use. It contains a java applet for calculating combustion products at different equivalence ratios. As you can see, non-stoichiometric combustion gets very complex.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You get CO instead of CO2 as a byproduct, which isnt' good.

Nautica
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top