Different definitions of acids/bases

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 392791
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definitions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the distinctions and relationships between Bronsted-Lowry, Arrhenius, and Lewis definitions of acids and bases. A Bronsted acid donates a proton (H+), while a Bronsted base accepts it. In contrast, Lewis acids accept electron pairs, and Lewis bases donate them, which can create confusion regarding their categorization. It is clarified that while all Lewis bases are also Bronsted-Lowry bases, not all Lewis acids are Bronsted acids. The necessity for Lewis theory arises from its broader applicability, particularly in organic and inorganic chemistry, allowing for the analysis of reactions that do not involve proton transfer. This expanded definition increases the number of recognized acid species and enhances understanding of chemical interactions beyond the limitations of Bronsted-Lowry theory. Despite the complexity of these definitions, they are essential for a comprehensive grasp of acid-base chemistry.
member 392791
I am having some difficulty in understanding the reason for the various types of acids/bases, of which i refer to bronsted-lowry, arrehenius, and lewis acids/bases. A bronsted acid donates an H+ and a bronsted base accepts a H+. However, a lewis accept acceps an e- pair and a lewis base donates an e- pair. This seems contradictory, is a lewis acid a bronsted base and lewis base a bronsted acid? What is the purpose of this, why isn't there a single definition of an acid and base.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Generally speaking, something is an acid if you add it to water and it lowers the pH. Clearly, an arrhenius or bronsted-lowry acid does this - they simply donate a proton.A lewis acid also does the same thing through the reactions;

X + H2O -> X-OH2 -> X-OH + H+

So we see a lewis acid also produces a hydrogen ion.
 
I am still not clear on how lewis bases/acids work, or why we need them. It seems that bronsted works just fine
 
Well, if you add a lewis acid to water, the pH goes down. Bronsted Lowry theory does not account for that. So SOMETHING new was needed.

Lewis acid/base theory is also more generally useful as you'll (possibly) find out in organic and inorganic chem.
 
Woopydalan said:
"This seems contradictory, is a lewis acid a bronsted base and lewis base a bronsted acid?"

Not quite. A Lewis base is also a BL base but Lewis acids don't have to be BL acids. In Lewis theory, we focus on the electron pair. In BL theory, we focus on the hydrogen proton (H+).

Woopydalan said:
I am still not clear on how lewis bases/acids work, or why we need them. It seems that bronsted works just fine

In organic chemistry, we generally are trying to find where the electron/s wants to go. What Lewis theory allows us to do is expand our definitions beyond transfer of just H+. So now we can treat reactions that do not involve proton transfer (BL theory) as acid-base reactions with Lewis theory. Thus we have increased the number of acid species available to work with based on the definition provided by Lewis Theory.

I do agree with you on how the definitions can be tedious or seem whimsical at times. It's important not to get slowed down by them though.
 
Last edited:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top