Different densities of the universe on different angles?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the density of the universe along specific lines of sight, particularly in relation to right ascension and declination. Participants explore the implications of this density on inertial forces and the potential for identifying variations in density across different directions in space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about resources to determine the density of the universe along specific lines of sight.
  • One participant asserts that the universe is isotropic, suggesting uniform density in all directions.
  • Another mentions that CMB temperature anisotropies can measure density gradients, indicating that variations exist but are minimal (1 part in 100,000).
  • A participant contrasts the non-uniformity of CMB temperature at decoupling with the expectation of averaging out variations over large scales in a homogeneous universe.
  • Some participants acknowledge the existence of slight deviations in density due to Large Scale Structure, questioning the extent of these variations.
  • One participant emphasizes the need to define the parameters of the inquiry, such as the distance to be considered and the angular resolution.
  • Another participant notes that while tiny differences in density exist, measuring the entire density along a line of sight is currently not feasible with existing cosmological observatories.
  • There is mention of gravitational lensing as a method to measure mass distribution, but it does not provide specific density values along a line of sight.
  • Some participants discuss the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, noting its relation to gravitational potentials rather than direct density measurement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the isotropy of the universe and the feasibility of measuring density along specific lines of sight. While some agree on the general isotropy, others highlight the existence of small deviations and the challenges in measurement, indicating unresolved aspects of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in current observational capabilities and the complexities involved in defining and measuring density along arbitrary lines in both time and space.

KingSnackMan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know of a resource that I could use to determine the density of the universe along a specific line of sight? (right ascension and declination)I am investigating inertial forces and looking to identify both the most and least dense directions in space and determine by how much they differ.
 
Space news on Phys.org
KingSnackMan said:
Does anybody know of a resource that I could use to determine the density of the universe along a specific line of sight? (right ascension and declination)I am investigating inertial forces and looking to identify both the most and least dense directions in space and determine by how much they differ.
The universe is isotropic, meaning that its density is the same in all directions.
 
CMB temperature anisotropies measure density gradients across the sky. Results from WMAP and Planck have determined the variation to be on the order of 1 part in 100,00, meaning the density of the universe is extremely unform in all directions. If the density gradient were larger this would show up as hot and cold spots in the CMB. The angular separation between these hot and cold spots would indicate the size of these various overdense and underdense regions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fervent Freyja
It's important to contrast my and Chronos's replies. Chronos refers to the non-uniformity of the temperature of the CMB at the time of decoupling: this means that the temperature of the universe at the places where the CMB photons observed today were emitted did indeed vary. This shows up today as an anisotropy of the temperature of the last scattering sphere. However, along the line of sight from Earth out to the edges of the observable universe, all of these variations should average out in a universe that is homogeneous and isotropic on large scales.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fervent Freyja
Thank you bapowell and Chronos. I understand that on the universe is very close to isotropic, but because of the Large Scale Structure there must be some directions where there are just slightly more voids, and others where there I slightly more nodes, right? I am looking for very small deviations from the average density of the universe.
 
You would need to define exactly what you mean. Do you want the average density along a line of sight all the way back to the surface of last scattering, or just out to some distance? And how large a δθ do you want to average over? If δθ is small, then a line of sight that intersects a nearby neutron star will have a much higher average density than one that does not.
 
KingSnackMan said:
Thank you bapowell and Chronos. I understand that on the universe is very close to isotropic, but because of the Large Scale Structure there must be some directions where there are just slightly more voids, and others where there I slightly more nodes, right? I am looking for very small deviations from the average density of the universe.
Sure, there will be tiny differences in the density as a function of direction since the universe isn't perfectly uniform. But you'd have to add up all the matter along each line of sight (each with some small cross section) between Earth and the edge of the observable universe to determine the anisotropy. This is not possible with today's cosmological observatories.
 
KingSnackMan said:
Does anybody know of a resource that I could use to determine the density of the universe along a specific line of sight? (right ascension and declination)I am investigating inertial forces and looking to identify both the most and least dense directions in space and determine by how much they differ.
I'm not aware of any method to measure the density along an entire line of sight. The only observable I can think of that might reflect that would be the lensing of the CMB, but that's a pretty subtle effect to measure, and I think you could only get some very generic statistics of the mass distribution, not the specific density along a particular line of sight.

It's definitely possible to measure the masses of particular structures via gravitational lensing (both strong and weak), but that won't get you the entire density along a line of sight.

I think if you just want to get an idea of the statistical properties of the matter distribution in our universe, look up measurements of the matter power spectrum.
 
bapowell said:
Sure, there will be tiny differences in the density as a function of direction since the universe isn't perfectly uniform. But you'd have to add up all the matter along each line of sight (each with some small cross section) between Earth and the edge of the observable universe to determine the anisotropy. This is not possible with today's cosmological observatories.
It is also unclear what that value would represent, as you integrate along an arbitrary line in both time and space. The integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect is something not too far away from that concept, and measurable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bapowell
  • #10
mfb said:
It is also unclear what that value would represent, as you integrate along an arbitrary line in both time and space. The integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect is something not too far away from that concept, and measurable.
Yes. But the ISW effect doesn't measure the density. It measures the change in gravitational potentials over time. When there's dark energy around, gravitational potentials get shallower over time, which blueshifts CMB photons that pass through large overdense regions. The problem is that the redshift/blueshift which results is indistinguishable from the fluctuations of the CMB itself, meaning that it can only be detected through the fact that it changes the statistical properties of the CMB.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K