Positive energy density of the universe

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the positive energy density of the universe, particularly in relation to the accelerating expansion observed through redshift data from distant galaxies and quasars. The acceleration of the universe's expansion, initially indicated by Type Ia supernovae measurements in 1999 and later confirmed with Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy data in 2003, suggests that vacuum energy density is responsible for this phenomenon. This implies a connection between vacuum energy density and the Casimir force, indicating that vacuum energy may change over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of redshift and its implications in cosmology
  • Familiarity with Type Ia supernovae as standard candles
  • Knowledge of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy data
  • Basic concepts of vacuum energy density and its role in cosmic expansion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of vacuum energy density on cosmic expansion
  • Explore the relationship between the Casimir effect and vacuum energy
  • Study the methodology behind measuring redshift and its significance in cosmology
  • Investigate the latest findings in dark energy and its impact on the universe's fate
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the dynamics of the universe's expansion and the role of vacuum energy in cosmology.

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
799
There is a Baez essay about the vaccum energy density, where he says:
The reason they get a positive energy density is very interesting. Thanks to the redshifts of distant galaxies and quasars, we've known for a long time that the universe is expanding. The new data shows something surprising: this expansion is speeding up. Ordinary matter can only make the expansion slow down, since gravity attracts - at least for ordinary matter.

So did they do what I might naively think of doing, namely just plotting the redshift data over a few years? Or is it a more subtle method that directly measures the time derivative of the expansion?

And if I understand correctly the vacuum energy density is the same thing as whatever is driving the acceleration in the expansion. Does that imply that, at least in principle, the Casimir force is changing over time?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
Both.
First (in 1999) came the measurement of brightnes-vs-redshift of 1a type supernovae (used as standard candles), showing the expansion is accelerating. Later (in 2003) the expansion acceleration was confirmed and value refined using CMB anisotropy data.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K